Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WITH THIS RING I THEE SODOMIZE
Chronicles Magazine ^ | April 2, 2002 | Thomas Fleming

Posted on 04/22/2002 2:48:37 PM PDT by A. Pole

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: UnuEl
Most of the Jews I know would take offense at that

Anyway, welcome to the Free Republic. You will find here people of every religion (including atheists).

41 posted on 04/23/2002 7:29:00 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UnuEl
Woops see reply to 37.
42 posted on 04/23/2002 7:29:31 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: UnuEl
Nothing like letting people make their own choices about how to conduct their lives?

The men who live the shameless, loathsome, disease-ridden, grossly sick, and highly dysfunctional gay lifestyle freely make the choice to live that lifestyle every day. "Choice" isn't what they're whining about. They have choice. What they want to do is to force all of society to recognize their lifestyle as the moral and legal equivalent of traditional marriage. They want to deny the rest of us the choice to reject the gay lifestyle and speak out against it.

44 posted on 04/23/2002 7:31:35 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: UnuEl
A large number of same-sex couple in this country are raising actual, real live children who exist.

I'm sure without too much trouble we could find pedophiles, necrophiles, and bestopilies out there doing the same thing. Does that mean we must embrace and celebrate their sexual perversions and consider their perverse relationships to be the moral and legal equivalents of traditional marriage?

45 posted on 04/23/2002 7:35:20 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: UnuEl
So marriage has nothing to do with protecting children?

I didn’t say that.

It has to do with deference to those who coulda woulda shoulda mighta had children if they coulda woulda.

Hehehe…is there any coherent resemblance of a point in there?

A large number of same-sex couple in this country are raising actual, real live children who exist. Seems to me offering protection to those children is more important than giving "deference" to those who never intended to have children in the first place.

A lot of single parents are doing the same, maybe we shoulda, woulda, coulda just give the special status of marriage to everyone.

47 posted on 04/23/2002 7:38:27 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: UnuEl
bullshit...

Let people make their own descisions on how to conduct THEIR own life and virtues not mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is not right that someone can take an issue that the MAJORITY holds sacred and distort it for their own use. It is a redefinition from the git go.

This tells me you hold NOTHING sacred. I hold marrage sacred. I am married to a woman, I reproduced with this woman and had two children, one on the way. What it the result of a homosexual marrage? Other than financial/benifit packages, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! It is obvious to me, YOU stand for absolutely nothing!

SR

48 posted on 04/23/2002 7:38:37 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Clint N. Suhks
Marriage is reserved for those who can procreate

So you're saying that because my wife is infertile we don't have a real marriage? The truth is a large number of people object to gay marriage for the same reason I object to yogurt: I just don't like it and I think it's icky. The sooner you can be honest about that the sooner this silly issue will finally go away.

50 posted on 04/23/2002 7:49:16 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Clint N. Suhks
I'm actually very bright. (c;

To whom were you speaking?

Dan

52 posted on 04/23/2002 8:00:48 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Who was it who said that Homosexual men don't want to be married, they just want to have a wedding?
53 posted on 04/23/2002 8:02:42 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trouducul
What are you afraid of? That they are gonna make your kids gay??? My God, I can't believe I live in a society where people are still that narrow minded.

It is better to be narrow minded and not to let pederasts to make our children join their ranks. Pederasts clearly want to be close to kids, to be scout instructors, to be priests, to be teachers. The sexual urges is one reason, the desire to replenish their ranks by "helping" teenagers to form their sexual identity is the other one.

You are a dinosaur, and hopefully you will be extinct soon.

You are very mistaken. The homosexuality is not the best survival strategy in Darwinian terms. The late pagan Rome was taken over by Christians in part because of the difference in the reproduction rate. Homosexuals and liberals are doomed to steal other people children in order to survive, but it will not work for ever. YOU are the dinosaurs - even if you get huge in the terms of the political and cultural control WE will possed the earth in the long run. The God and Nature are on our side.

54 posted on 04/23/2002 8:02:48 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Robert Frost once described the liberal as someone "unwilling to take his own side in an argument."

LMAO!

55 posted on 04/23/2002 8:03:22 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
So you're saying that because my wife is infertile we don't have a real marriage?

No, but we do know that procreation between male and female is how babies are made and deference is given for the possibility.

The truth is a large number of people object to gay marriage for the same reason I object to yogurt: I just don't like it and I think it's icky. The sooner you can be honest about that the sooner this silly issue will finally go away.

Umm…the truth is that marriage is for survival of the species and pretending an anus is a vagina is not a legitimate reason to grant special status. The sooner you can be honest about that the sooner this silly issue will finally go away.

56 posted on 04/23/2002 8:05:08 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Sorry! I replied to the wrong post. Bygones.
57 posted on 04/23/2002 8:08:25 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
UnuEl

Bu bye!

58 posted on 04/23/2002 8:12:31 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I can't understand this "deference" crap. How are we paying deference to people that might maybe possibly be able to procreate by refusing to allow people that clearly can't to have the same 5th ammendment right extensions? See that's what you guys miss. What the gay community is looking for is the side benefits that come with being married: the 5th ammendment extension, the lower auto insurance rates, stuff like that. There's a whole world of legal and extra-legal benefits YOU refuse to let them have because YOU don't like how they fornicate. Problem is it's none of YOU'RE business. This isn't "deference" it's bigotry, plain and simple.

The truth is that marriage is a social construct and the species survived a hell of a long time without it. And if the social construct is so pathetically weak that it can't survive letting homosexuals in on the deal then it's time for that social construct to end, put it out of it's misery. There's plenty of species on this rock that manage to mate for life without even having language skills, much less marriage. We can't even manage it with the social construct. Let them in or let it end.

59 posted on 04/23/2002 8:17:26 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson