Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brzezinski s defence of Palestinians
The Frontier Post ^ | 4/22/2002 | Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid

Posted on 04/22/2002 1:06:20 PM PDT by malarski

http://www.frontierpost.com.pk/articles.asp?id=5&date1=4/22/2002

The Frontier Post

Brzezinski’s defence of Palestinians Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid
Updated on 4/22/2002 9:55:30 AM

Former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski surprised many Americans when he criticized the military policy of the Israeli government and compared it with that of the former apartheid government of South Africa.

It is not an easy task to counter the massive pro-Israeli wave in the US media, which have condensed the current Middle East crisis into a war against terror, linking it with the September 11 events in New York and Washington.

Unfortunately, Ariel Sharon has succeeded in making the American public believe that Israel is currently waging a war against terrorism.

Sharon has influenced not only the ill-informed among the people, but also those who should know better.

Brzezinski, who appeared in a debate with Henry Kissinger, also a former security advisor, on CNN, was candid in his arguments and fair in rejecting the present crisis as a war against terror.

Unfortunately, the United States, with its full weight thrown behind Israel, until the latest speech by President Bush indicated a slight shift, has accepted the Israeli claim that it is waging a war against terrorism.

Israel also holds Yasser Arafat responsible for “terrorism”.

Anyone who is conversant with the political climate in Palestine knows well that though President Arafat is the legitimate head of the Palestinian Authority and the popular symbol of Palestinian aspirations, he does not have control over all the events there.

Consequently, besieging him and threatening him with exile can serve no purpose other than that of finding a scapegoat for Sharon’s failure to bring security for the Israelis as he had promised at the time of election.

Sharon needs only a symbolic victory; and he will find it easy to accomplish it, as would any head of a state commanding a mighty army fighting an enemy who has no army at all.

As Brzezinski pointed out, Israelis cannot have both peace and land at the same time.

Thirty-five years of futile occupation have proved beyond doubt that peace can never be achieved by repression.

Even if Arafat is removed from the political scene and isolated or put to death, peace and security will still elude Israel, and for a much more longer time.

The Israeli public knows this fact.

Precisely for this reason, the Americans, who have to pay the cost of this war with their earnings and with their safety, should not be tricked into accepting such ideas.

I noted with great sadness that on the three days I spent in the city of Houston, I found American TV distorting the developments in the Middle East with selective reports and pictures.

All the stations repeated the chorus that this is a war against terror.

They never explained that there are other crimes as heinous as terror.

Occupation is an internationally condemned crime committed against populations and their land.

In a prejudiced and selective manner, the Americans link their destiny with the Israelis by mistakenly drawing a parallel between their country’s response to the attacks on New York and Washington and Israel’s occupation of the Palestinians’ land, thus entering a dark tunnel riddled with dangers.

After comparing the activities of the Sharon government with the racist South African government, Brzezinski warned Israel that the plight of its government would not be different from that of South Africa if it insisted on occupying and humiliating a whole people in the name of security, history or religion or in the name of its special relations with a superpower.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: brzezinski; israel; palestine; usmedia
Interesting comments
1 posted on 04/22/2002 1:06:20 PM PDT by malarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: malarski
The author's argument that Arafat can not control the murderous tendencies of the other Palestinians is laughable - is there any evidence whatsoever that Arafat has even attempted to do so? Rather, the evidence is that Arafat has supported the acts of terror. And so with that bit of silliness the author discredits all of his arguments.
2 posted on 04/22/2002 1:12:36 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
Looks like Brzezinski agrees with his former boss, Jimmy Carter...and why do I think some Carter-era holdovers are still at the State Department?
3 posted on 04/22/2002 1:14:43 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: malarski
Interesting comments Ineteresting or useful?

What have you found to be interesting and/or new?

4 posted on 04/22/2002 1:17:18 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Looks like Brzezinski agrees with his former boss, Jimmy Carter...and why do I think some Carter-era holdovers are still at the State Department?

Because Pres. Bush is too cowardly to fire all the Socialist third-world lovers in the State Department?

5 posted on 04/22/2002 1:20:08 PM PDT by Kobyashi1942
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: malarski
IMO, this defence of the Palestinians and the recent column by Buckley are due to the large number of $audi $ in the US markets. Some estimates say 500Bill. CNNAOLTimeWarner is reputed to have a $audi ownership content of 5-10%.
Would be an interesting project for WSJ or Forbes or Fortune to detail the USCorps with a significant $audi invenstment.
6 posted on 04/22/2002 1:22:26 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kobyashi1942
I figure the Arabists are both deeply entrenched and civil service. But I wish W would fire their butts.
7 posted on 04/22/2002 1:25:35 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Catspaw
Looks like Brzezinski agrees with his former boss, Jimmy Carter...and why do I think some Carter-era holdovers are still at the State Department?

Since the Pakistani Press likes Brzezinski so much, maybe they could find him a job, foreign minister of something.

9 posted on 04/22/2002 1:26:47 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
Arafat has chosen to ride the tiger, rather than be eaten by it.
10 posted on 04/22/2002 1:29:31 PM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark;GROUCHOTWO; CommiesOut; madrussian; Askel5; Zviadist; kristinn; Free the USA...
"Former US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski surprised many Americans when he criticized the military policy of the Israeli government ..."

I find this very interesting.

11 posted on 04/22/2002 1:36:10 PM PDT by malarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: malarski
As Brzezinski pointed out, Israelis cannot have both peace and land at the same time.

Ohhhhhh, I get it, now......

give up some land, get some peace from over here; give up some land, get some peace over there; give up some land, get some peace where you are standing; give up ALL your land, you can have all the peace you want.

Sounds simple enough. (/SARCASM)

12 posted on 04/22/2002 1:41:18 PM PDT by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right_to_defend
I dont't think tax $ supporting CNN would get much play here!
13 posted on 04/22/2002 1:44:16 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: malarski
In a prejudiced and selective manner, the Americans link their destiny with the Israelis by mistakenly drawing a parallel between their country’s response to the attacks on New York and Washington and Israel’s occupation of the Palestinians’ land, thus entering a dark tunnel riddled with dangers.

No actually Americans compare with our war on terror to Palistinian terrorists blowing up civilians along with themselves, not Israel's occupation.

Let's not forget there would never have been an occupation had not 3 Arab countries not tried to do away with Israel in '67. They brought it on themselves. There also wouldn't be an occupation if Arafat accepted the Camp David peace process in which the Pals would have 96% of the occupied territories.

After comparing the activities of the Sharon government with the racist South African government, Brzezinski warned Israel that the plight of its government would not be different from that of South Africa if it insisted on occupying and humiliating a whole people in the name of security, history or religion or in the name of its special relations with a superpower.

Security sounds like a pretty good reason to me. Until the Arabs/Muslims agree that Israel has a right to simply exist Israel must be ever on the defensive, or at times, even the offensive. And as far as being humiliated, too bad. They brought the humiliation on themselves.

Occupation is an internationally condemned crime committed against populations and their land.

Agreed. However this occupation came about because the agressors in a war lost. And as a matter of self defense Israel has to keep its would be conquerors in check.

14 posted on 04/22/2002 2:03:05 PM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If I had any respect left for Brzezinski, I don't now; how can any American side with the terrorist Palestinians? HOW???
15 posted on 04/22/2002 2:03:14 PM PDT by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: malarski; malcolm; all
Yeah.

With Brzezinski's boss at the helm, we gave Iran to the Ayatollah, our nation was disgraced and humiliated, gas prices were sky high with mile long lines at the gas pumps, home mortgages shot up to 17 percent interest rates, and the federal government mandated that all businesses keep there thermostats at 68 degrees during the winter.
Tell Brzezinski and his cronies to move to France and do their bellyaching there.


16 posted on 04/23/2002 9:31:00 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson