Posted on 04/22/2002 2:43:14 AM PDT by kattracks
Edward Cardinal Egan's stand-in at St. Patrick's Cathedral pointedly blamed the priest sex abuse scandal yesterday on homosexuality, a "sex-saturated" society and a constant assault on celibacy by liberals.In a 15-minute homily from the most prominent Roman Catholic pulpit in the city, Msgr. Eugene Clark labeled the United States "probably the most immoral country" in the Western hemisphere. He also called homosexuality "a disorder" and said gay men shouldn't be allowed to become priests.
Clark, 76, a longtime key player and conservative voice in the Archdiocese of New York, delivered his stinging homily as Egan and other U.S. cardinals left for Rome to meet with the Pope about priestly pedophilia.
After preaching about forgiveness, Clark detailed reasons he believes some priests victimized children. He appeared to place most of the blame on homosexuality, saying the theory that people are born gay "is not true."
"The tendency to homosexuality is a disorder, not a sin," he said. "But the practice of homosexuality is truly sinful."
Some parishioners in the packed pews shifted uneasily, others nodded in agreement and a few walked out. But Clark continued, arguing that it was a "grave mistake" to allow gays in the priesthood. He blamed American society for being "very protective" of homosexuality.
"Homosexuality became in the American exchange of views a protected area," he said. "And unfortunately ... homosexual students were allowed to pass through seminaries. Grave mistake. Not because homosexuals in anyway tend to criminality, but because it is a disorder."
'The Most Immoral Country'
Clark also criticized what he called "the campaign of liberal America against celibacy."
He theorized that priests who have a tendency toward sexually abusing children a group he pegged at 3% of the nation's clergy were affected by a barrage of sinful images in society.
"Liberated sex is offered to people all day long, all evening long," he said. "There is nothing quite like it."
"We know we won't mention it outside the cathedral we are probably the most immoral country certainly in the Western hemisphere and maybe the larger circle because of the entertainment we suffer and what it's done to our [country's] morals ...," Clark said.
Christine Schubert of St. Paul dashed out of the cathedral midway through the homily. "I left because I realized I have no desire to be connected with the institution of the Catholic Church," said Schubert, 27. "I thought, wouldn't it be great if the entire church walked out?"
But few did. Most parishioners stayed, and many applauded Clark after his sermon.
Marianne Duddy, executive director of Dignity/USA, the nation's largest organization of gay Catholics, called Clark's comments linking the sex scandal with homosexuality "incredibly horrifying and irresponsible."
"This is a poor attempt to deflect attention away from the church's culpability for the sexual abuse of minors by priests and its attempt to cover it up for decades," she added.
But Catholic League President William Donohue praised Clark. "He makes a great deal of sense and to have this said so articulately by one of the brighter priests in the New York area is very encouraging," Donohue said.
"The internal problem in the church is a lack of governance and due to diligence," he added. "But there is no question about it this is a societywide problem that goes way beyond the Catholic Church."
With Gretchen E. Weber
Because so many homosexual priests are active; we now have very influential clergy in chanceries and orders and seminaries protecting, or in the least remaining silent about, ALL of the homosexuals including, unfortunately, those who would abuse children.A very telling point, TM. IMO, in many cases the tacit acceptance of homosexually active priests seems to have been rooted in an attitude of, "There, but for the grace of God, go I."
I don't see everyone in the country jumping all over the entire public school system every time a school board has hired a pedophile -- or the YMCA -- or the Boy Scouts. In fact, in the case of the Boy Scouts, the entire country seems to be jumping all over them for NOT hiring pedophiles.
I'll agree with you only because early Christians did not kill their children -- whereas their contemporaries, the early Romans, just discarded any unwanted children, leaving them in the street to die or to be rescued by someone else. To me, that is one of the greatest signs that Christianity is the Way and the Truth. If pride were not one of the seven deadly sins, I would say that I am PROUD of the Christian stance on caring for helpless children.
This country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and that is why abortion was anathama and illegal. Roe v. Wade is an abomination and a great stain on this society. I pray for its reversal.
Prohibiting th murder of the most innocent and helpless in a community has always been thought to be a "morality" that can--indeed, must--be forced on the others. Roe v. Wade got around this by judicially legislating that some segments of society are free to murder with impunity and solely for personal convenience.
To make this ghastly murder psychically palatable, Roe v. Wade and the feminist lobby redefined the victim as subhuman (a definitional shift that is invariably applied to one's enemies in wartime as well) and postured it as a libertarian "freedom of choice" (the usual fig leaf employed by the politics of heedless self-indulgence) issue. Recast, the issue was not about destroying innocent human life, but the moral equivalent of having a wart removed.
If buying into that lie makes you more comfortable with mass murder, that's your problem. Just realize you are employing the same rationalization the the Nazis used to justify the holocaust and that the SCOTUS used in the 1850s to declare that some men, women, and children were mere personal property that could be disposed of at the convenience and will of the property owner.
I would be ashamed of being associated with such a brutal and inhumane legacy. Not so the pro-aborts. They have no shame.
This is not a fact. The major reasons behind the laws making abortion illegal were advances in medicine and the feminism of the suffragettes. Up until the early 19th century most physicians and other people had no idea that unborn children were alive, before the so called 'quickening' in the fifth month, which had been interpreted as the beginning of life. Abortion was not feasible after that point, and the realization that the child was alive led the medical associations to forbid physicians to assist in abortions.
Early suffragettes, such as Susan B. Anthony, recognized that the function of abortion was to allow men to exploit women for sexual purposes, without consequences. The fact that this is true is still demonstrated by the fact that abortion is more supported by men than women in America today.
That's a typical chant of the left as they force their "morals" on everyone else. The difference is that their morals are all relative, whereas Christian morals are absolute as defined and revealed by God.
A bitter blow to Brazil.
Sheesh, a little proofreading would have had me asking how did a Cardinal (my paste) get demoted to a Monsignor (title)? Sorry...oh well, here's an anti-sodomite, Pro-Msgr. Clark BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.