Replies

In regards to my question about Klayman vs His Mom and who won: He never, ever says.

But isn't it curious that in the article you posted from that left leaning rag, where his Mom and her friends are whining about their mistreatment (never mind what they did to her mom) and making the whole matter public (despite the obvious embarrassment and harm that might cause), they didn't say they won? I can understand why Klayman wouldn't since he tried to keep the lawsuit a family matter, as it should be. But why would a left leaning news organization like the Washington Post drop such a juicy story ... unless Klayman in fact won the suit?

Am I to understand that you are suggesting that the administration conduct politically motivated IRS audits to prove that they do not engage in politically motivated IRS audits?

Not at all. ONLY a democRAT would suggest that there isn't credible INFORMATION suggesting that Jackson's organizations violated the law where the IRS is concerned. Are you telling us you don't believe Bill O'Reilly? I'm asking for just the opposite ... that Jackson be audited BASED ON THE INFORMATION, rather than NOT being audited, for political reasons.

If Klayman won, why wouldn't he tell callers who have asked him about it on radio shows, rather than let this rumor continue? Why wouldn't he say, "And we, of course, were right and the court heard all the testimony and ruled in our favor?" Or did he, once again, settle? Don't try the keeping it private thing. It's out there. The only reason to keep it quiet is because it's embarassing to him.

where his Mom and her friends are whining about their mistreatment (never mind what they did to her mom) and making the whole matter public (despite the obvious embarrassment and harm that might cause), they didn't say they won?

What makes you think THEY are lying? What proof do YOU have that THEY are lying? Who knows, maybe Larry thought his grandmother still had some money and when he found out she had given it to her daughter, he sued.

BTW, there were SEVERAL people who signed affadavits backing the Mother's side; are they ALL lying? Why would they?

Here is my answer:

I trust the Bush Administration to do what is best for the country. If they want to prosecute...fine. If they want to move on....fine. I am more interested in the war on terrorists.

You don't like my answer, and label me a "move-on" type. I don't like YOUR attitude, and will label you "obsessive." How do you like those apples?