Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MoscowMike
Look, Klayman is saying that the IRS is after him for political reasons. Some of us think he's stalling so people can't see his financial reports. As I showed you above, he isn't spending very much on "legal" expenses.

And I can concentrate on two things at once. I can think Klayman should tell who backs him AND think the Clintons, et al., should hang.

776 posted on 04/24/2002 1:21:41 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin, goldilucky
When there is no law requiring him to do so, why should he? Right now, that would be a 4th Amendment violation against his supporters.
777 posted on 04/24/2002 1:26:18 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
What I don't understand is why this should be considered political harassment. Clinton is not in office, and if the AG found that the complaint was without meerit, then how in the heck could it be political?

Unless, of course, Klayman is really anti-Bush, and then is accusing the Bush administration of payback. But he isn't anti-Bush, is he? He is a non-partisan watchdog group.

780 posted on 04/24/2002 1:28:13 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Howdy

Watch the watch dog huh? Well, God bless you, I think you're off on a tangent. The IRS being used as a scourge upon those whose concience moves them to criticize the corruption of the political left is just a taste of what is to come if that evil movement can rewrite the compact between the American People and the American Government.

Which is the plan of course, stated long and loud by hitler's stepchildren, the left wing of modern American politics.

Today's IRS abuse of scores of citizens will be tomorrow's executions and reeducation centers if the left can do here what it has done on every other corner of the planet.

You flog whoever you please, I have bigger fish to fry.

781 posted on 04/24/2002 1:29:12 PM PDT by MoscowMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
I can think Klayman should tell who backs him AND think the Clintons, et al., should hang.

Concerning the portion in bold ... are you trying to claim that you are not a move-on'er ... when every other person on this thread who is attacking Klayman and who is overtly friendly with you is one ... when you won't answer my simple questions about Clinton's crimes and who is REALLY responsible for investigating and prosecuting them ... when you refuse to even discuss the specific allegations against Clinton and the DNC ... when you never show up on any thread discussing those allegations. Don't make us laugh. Pardon me (sic) if I don't for one minute believe you want Clinton to hang.

823 posted on 04/24/2002 3:02:57 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson