Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.


Skip to comments.

JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT
Judicial Watch ^ | April 18, 2002

Posted on 04/18/2002 10:49:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist

For Immediate Release

Apr 18, 2002

Press Office: 202-646-5172

JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT

IRS OFFICIAL ADMITS: “WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU SUE THE PRESIDENT?”

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the non-profit educational foundation that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it was fighting in court an audit attempt instituted by the Clinton IRS in retaliation for Judicial Watch’s litigation against President Clinton. Judicial Watch first received notice of an attempted IRS audit on October 9, 1998, a few days after its “Interim Impeachment Report,” which called for Bill Clinton’s impeachment for misuse of the IRS, was officially made part of the Congressional record. The IRS’s initial audit letter demanded that Judicial Watch “[p]rovide the names and addresses of the directors and their relationship to any political party or political groups.” In January, 1999, an IRS official admitted to Judicial Watch representatives, in the context of the propriety of the audit, “What do you expect when you sue the President?” Another IRS official admitted in June, 1999, that the political affiliations of Judicial Watch’s directors is a factor in any IRS audit.

After Judicial Watch scored legal victories against the Clinton Administration, Judicial Watch received audit notices and warnings from the IRS. For instance, immediately following its uncovering of the Clinton-Gore White House e-mail scandal in February, 2000, Judicial Watch lawyers received a call from an IRS official to inform them that Judicial Watch was still on the IRS’s “radar screen.” The IRS finally agreed to defer on deciding whether to audit Judicial Watch until after the Clinton Administration ended. Despite this agreement, in one of the last acts of the Clinton Administration, the IRS sent Judicial Watch another audit notice on January 8, 2001. The IRS also sent new audit notices throughout 2001 after Judicial Watch criticized IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti. Rossotti is a Clinton appointee who “inexplicably” continues to serve under President Bush. In addition to presiding over the audits of perceived critics of the Clinton Administration, Judicial Watch requested criminal and civil investigations of Rossotti for his criminal conflict of interest in holding stock in a company he founded, AMS, while it did business with the IRS.

Judicial Watch now is fighting the attempted audit in federal courts in the District of Columbia and Maryland. As Robert Novak reports in his April 18th column, despite repeated requests to Attorney General Ashcroft to investigate, his Bush Justice Department has thus far refused to do so. (See Judicial Watch's letter to Attorney General John Aschroft) Instead, in the context of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit against the Cheney Energy Task Force, a Bush Administration official told Novak, “I don't know what we are going to do with this Klayman.” A copy of Judicial Watch’s complaint against IRS officials is available by clicking here.

“Judicial Watch has no objection to IRS audits at the proper time and place, under correct, non-political circumstances. We have nothing to hide. But when we were told that we were being audited because we sued Bill Clinton, we had no choice but to stand up and fight in court. Now, for its own reasons, the Bush Administration is content to let Clinton appointee Rossotti continue to harass Judicial Watch. Our lawsuits in response are intended not only to protect Judicial Watch, but are for the good of all Americans,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

© Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judicialwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,001-2,014 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I wonder why Paul disn't take the deal reportedly offered by the government? He -- or rather his attorney Larry Klaymann and Judicial Watch -- has already publicly admitted to a crime.

Maybe the terms of the deal weren't satisfactory in that he thought that the "goods" he had on the Clintons should warrant a lighter punishment than what he was being offered.
1,661 posted on 04/29/2002 8:52:03 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
I think Hillary should eat her words. Hell to pay is on its way back at her.
1,662 posted on 04/29/2002 10:16:19 AM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
I am sure that there are completely logical reasons why, some of the suggestions you have made do make sense. Either way, we will probably find out sometime soon.
1,663 posted on 04/29/2002 10:18:00 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1661 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
As long as the political ramifications won't hurt them too much, I am sure that they will. They would rather go after Paul rather than Clinton directly.
1,664 posted on 04/29/2002 10:19:24 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
I believe that you are correct, we'll have to wait and see.
1,665 posted on 04/29/2002 10:19:53 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1662 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Always nice to hear from you Fred.
1,666 posted on 04/29/2002 10:20:50 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
You also have to realize that everyone is subject to random audits, and Larry's number might have turned up.

Do you honestly believe there was no political motivation in the Clinton IRS going after Klayman? Then how do you explain the unreasonably high number of conservative organizations that were audited they were just "random"? How do you explain that virtually every one of the those individuals who went after Clinton or disclosed something damaging about him were audited within a short time of doing so? Do you need a list of all those names or have you been paying attention? Whether or not the Bush administration now has LEGITIMATE reasons to audit Klayman, it is ridiculous to maintain that the initial audit against Judicial Watch was anything more than payback and harassment.

Or, there could have been discrepancies as in the article deport posted above, which would certainly give "probable and reasonable cause" for further investigation.

Geeeee. Don't you think that all the "discrepancies" O'Reilly and others found in Jessie Jackson's organizations might give "probable and reasonable cause" for further investigation? I'll believe the Bush IRS audit of JW isn't politically motivated when I hear that Jackson has/is being audited. That being said ... audit away.

1,667 posted on 04/29/2002 10:56:42 AM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1652 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Yeah and I don't think we'll have to wait very long. Things are starting to heat up.
1,668 posted on 04/29/2002 12:01:51 PM PDT by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1665 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
I agree.
1,669 posted on 04/29/2002 12:03:35 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1668 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"Actually, I sort of hope so too, for your sake -- I'd hate to see your youthful idealism crushed."

Well, I am sure that Judicial Watch will come through with an error free audit if they lose their current battle against it. It would take a lot to crush my outlook on life, I think.

Anyway, to address the rest of your reply, I am sure that Judicial Watch has probably already considered opening up a Midwest branch of their organization. I also assume that Chicago or the surrounding suburbs would be a no-brainer to them, especially if planning to open a branch in the Midwest. Chicago or its suburbs would definately be the best place to put it. There is plenty of corruption there. Perhaps they could help the along the Liscense for Bribes investigation, or the Chicago Outfit connection that so many local politicians have. Illinois needs Judicial Watch around to help rid the state of its rampant corruption.

1,670 posted on 04/29/2002 12:11:07 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1652 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
From an interview done in Dallas in Sept. 01 by the 'ethical Washington Watchdog'. I suppose a few months aren't up yet....


1,671 posted on 04/29/2002 1:18:37 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1670 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz;Alamo Girl;kristinn;Republic;Registered;Angelwood;Ragtime Cowgirl;RonDog;VOA...
...I remember PETER PAUL's VideoTape on ABC's ..'20/20'.. showing HILLARY CLINTON telling him directly that she NEVER communicates through E-Mails for what her enemies would find in them.

...I remember those Long Beach Patriots fighting to save the Long Beach Navy Base from being turned over to the Communist Chinese Army Gang for Communsit China Army Money by the CLINTONS as they followed the CLINTON money trail right up to our Oval Office door and then stopping = No E-Mails.

...I remember TV Reports last friday on.. www.ExtraTV.com ..that BILL CLINTON could be replacing BYRANT GUMBALL on CBS' ..'The Early Show'..so he can propell his wife HILLARY "No E-Mails" CLINTON past BUSH into the Presidency in Year 2004 thru TV. He will also be taking this daily TV opportunity to scream over and over again to the American People about Sept 11th ..."It ain't my Fault, It ain't my Fault" ..when it IS, it IS.

NEVER FORGET... If ADOLF HITLER had had TV up his sleeve, the way the CLINTONS do now, he would have won World War II...

...as their TV Protector DAN RATHER signs up for another 6 years of covering up the CLINTONS' own worst misbehaviors...on CBS-TV.

1,672 posted on 04/29/2002 1:33:16 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies]

To: deport
Oh, thanks for the information. I guess that St. Louis beats Chicago out for that plan. For disliking Judicial Watch as much as you do, you sure know a lot about them.
1,673 posted on 04/29/2002 2:05:52 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1671 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist, deport
FreedominJesusChrist to deport: For disliking Judicial Watch as much as you do, you sure know a lot about them.

These move-on'ers sure do, don't they. Certainly more than the average person who might have contributed to them all those years and is feeling like nothing was accomplished. It makes you wonder what their real agenda is, doesn't it?

1,674 posted on 04/29/2002 3:28:37 PM PDT by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
Perhaps this is covert admiration.
1,675 posted on 04/29/2002 3:32:36 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1674 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Fight Fight Fight!
1,676 posted on 04/29/2002 3:32:43 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist, Aloha Ronnie, Buchanan mama
Thanks for the ping, FreedominJessusChrist!

Just think, all Judicial Watch has to do is force the indictment of Hillary Clinton on ONE issue, and her candidacy for President will be finished!!

Every Freeper and Patriotic American must realize that Judicial Watch is our ONLY chance!!

Donate something, help the cause!
www.judicialwatch.org
Because Later will be TOO LATE!!

1,677 posted on 04/29/2002 4:51:25 PM PDT by reformjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]

To: reformjoy
Do you want to be added to the JW ping list? Honestly, it gets bigger everyday, which is encouraging.
1,678 posted on 04/29/2002 5:25:53 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1677 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
1700 is not as prestigious as 2000, for sure, but one step at a time! :)
1,679 posted on 04/29/2002 5:29:56 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1655 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Where have our lovely friends South... and Howlin been?
1,680 posted on 04/29/2002 5:34:34 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1679 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,001-2,014 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson