I'm dealing with several phone calls while I'm doing this. We're bringing as many people on board as we can. For the moment I sacrificed the phrasing in order to bring more strength to our position. I'll try to devote specific attention to "prose" from now on.
Let's try it again with a direct answer: Do you believe a homosexual has the right to inflict their beliefs upon an innocent child when those beliefs are completely contrary to those by which the childs parents have raised the child by?
Not the school, a homosexual, or in this case a homosexual advocate. Better yet, does the minority, consisting of some 2% of the whole have the right to promote it's own beliefs over the other 98% despite the fact that the majority objects to it?
Of course this sort of things happened all the time, under communism.
So in your world it would be a crime to....what exactly? Be specific.
I believe it to be a criminal act to openly support public acts of homosexuality and inflict such behavior on those who find it intolerable.
I think this pretty much said it. Inflicting intolerable behavior upon innocent children that by today's standards equate pedophilia or at the very least child molestation would be a crime. In my world that is, GLSEN apparently wants to make it part of the curriculum.
It doesn't matter what rhetorical nonsense the-not-so-Great want's to duck behind, the fact is that GLAAD and GSLEN clearly favor such instruction, particularly when it is against parent desires, so that they can undermine the "homophobia" they are taught at home.