Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greeley's Dirty Little Secret? [why hasn't he given this information to authorities?]
www.tcrnews.com ^ | Matt C. Abbott

Posted on 04/17/2002 6:57:07 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: history_matters
My guess is that upon his death a massive expose memoir by Greeley will be published.

If your guess is correct, it indicates that he doesn't possess the fortitude to come forward with the information and face the reprecussions, and as others here have questioned: what is he waiting for?

21 posted on 04/17/2002 12:12:34 PM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
OK. Please read Eileen McNamara's editorial, which I posted. How can we expect Law, Egan, Mahoney, Keeler, and George to be a part of the solution when they are, to a great extent, the cause of the problem?
22 posted on 04/17/2002 12:12:55 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
From The Washington Times: "90 percent of recorded abuse cases are from teen-age boys...One child psychiatrist in the District, who did not wish to be identified, criticized the American Psychiatric Assocation for 'prostituting themselves and getting politically correct.' He said the APA has downplayed the role of homosexuality in both pedophilia and ephebophilia. 'It's a lie' to disassociate homosexuality from sexual abuse of male minors, the doctor said in an interview."

Washington Times article: here

So the media, liberals, and some church leaders (like Monsignor McSweeney who has been appearing on Alan Keyes' show) have been peddling falsehoods in an orchestrated disinformation campaign to blame church teachings rather than homosexuality for the raging scandals. "90 Percent of recorded abuse cases are from teen-age boys..."

23 posted on 04/17/2002 12:17:31 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
I guess you don't really care to find out "the truth" either.

Not sure how you could jump to such an assinine conclusion. There are laity in the Church fighting tooth and nail behind the scenes to purge these SOB's from the priesthood.

First of all when I said, "I guess you don't really care to find out 'the truth' either" the "you" was refering to the author of this piece, not "you" in particular, just in case you took it that way.

Secondly, let's look at these two paragraphs (from Matt C. Abbot's article):

Now, if Greeley is telling the truth, and he ostensibly is so interested in justice, why on earth hasn't he given this information he has in "safekeeping" to the authorities?

From this paragraph, I think it's safe to assume that this person is criticizing Greeley for being a hypocrite, because Greeley seems to not really be interested in exposing the people he accused earlier of being murderers. By the way, I think that's a fair judgement! However....

This is a question that even Francis Cardinal George, Archbishop of Chicago, seemingly can't answer. When Yours truly asked the Cardinal last year about Greeley's aforementioned allegation, the Cardinal responded that he did ask Greeley twice about it, and that all Greeley told him was to talk to two priests - the names of which Greeley apparently gave to him. (The Cardinal didn't say who they were, and, for obvious reasons, I didn't ask.) But no evidence was provided.

Now from this paragraph, we can see that Greeley told Cardinal George the two names, and, since nothing else has been done, investigation wise, we can assume that the buck stopped at the Cardinal.

Why didn't the cardinal investigate further?

Why didn't the author investigate further by asking the names, and investigating himself? What is that crap about "...for obvious reasons..."? WHAT obvious reasons? If you're so concerned about getting to the bottom of the mystery, and you criticize Greeley for preventing that, then why wouldn't you want to ask the names of the preists, and ask them yourself?

I'm only criticizing the apparent hypocricy on the author's part; I'm not supporting Fr. Greeley in any way.

24 posted on 04/17/2002 12:20:09 PM PDT by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
This article from The Washington Times should be entered into whatever official document the NCCB finally releases on the subject. I hope these facts are discussed with the Pope by the U.S. cardinals in Rome. Any further attempt by literate, sane, breathing adults to suppress or obscure the homosexual nature of the problem are clearly efforts of deliberate disinformation.
25 posted on 04/17/2002 12:20:39 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Why didn't the author investigate further by asking the names, and investigating himself? What is that crap about "...for obvious reasons..."? WHAT obvious reasons? If you're so concerned about getting to the bottom of the mystery, and you criticize Greeley for preventing that, then why wouldn't you want to ask the names of the preists, and ask them yourself?

I think the "obvious reasons" (or one of them) is that there was no way in hell the Cardinal would have told him the names of the priests, even if he did ask.

SD

26 posted on 04/17/2002 12:44:40 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lemonhead
why is it that everyone is piling on now like these are all new stories. How come nobody ever talks about all of the good things that hundreds of thousands of priests have done for all of us?

Let's see: Mussolini made the trains run on time. Hitler revived the German economy.

No amount of good could undo or cover up the evil that has been done by these priests who are supposedly men of God but yet are just a bunch of sick and twisted people. Until the Catholic church is ready to clean house of all this behavior there can be no resolution.

27 posted on 04/17/2002 12:46:36 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I think the "obvious reasons" (or one of them) is that there was no way in hell the Cardinal would have told him the names of the priests, even if he did ask.

I suppose that's possible, but the point is the author didn't even try to ask. I think it's rather obvious what's going on here, the author has (rightly or wrongly) a dislike for Fr. Greeley, and is willing to use anything to smear him.

Again, I'm not defending Greeley, I don't even know anything about him. But I really detest people who write stuff about other people without at least attempting to be unbiased about it.

28 posted on 04/17/2002 12:55:52 PM PDT by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
I haven't liked Greeley in years. . He's seemed a little too charming, sophisticated, sly and "anti-Catholic Church."

I'll sum up my feelings by saying I think he would fit in really well at a Kennedy family dinner.

29 posted on 04/17/2002 1:01:02 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Matt C. Abbott
Director of Public Affairs
Pro-Life Action League
Chicago
30 posted on 04/17/2002 1:07:32 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
I've talked to Matt, he's a good guy, we collaborated on a Wanderer article once a while back, AMERICA Magazine's Disinformation About Church's position on AIDS and Condom Use.

But he does seem to have a strong opinion against Greeley, one shared by many orthodox Catholics, incidentally.

As far as I'm concerned, Greeley is complicit in continued crimes for witholding this information from law enforcement. A priest should be willing to prevent the abuse of innocents even at the cost of personal sacrifice.

31 posted on 04/17/2002 1:17:57 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
As far as I'm concerned, Greeley is complicit in continued crimes for witholding this information from law enforcement.

If this story is true, I agree. It looks like Greeley took this tip from Pontius Pilate...

If you don't get what you ask for, then give up (and make sure to wash your hands).

32 posted on 04/17/2002 1:28:47 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp;syriacus
Of course, there's the possibility that Greeley is exagerating what he knows, and doesn't really know enough to report anyone. He like to be seen as ``in the know.''
33 posted on 04/17/2002 2:43:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. | April 17, 2002 | Stephen G. Brady

Posted on 4/17/02 5:17 PM Eastern by Dr. Brian Kopp

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1 PM EDT, April 17, 2002

CATHOLIC WATCHDOG GROUP CALLS ON U.S. CARDINALS TO AFFIRM CHURCH TEACHING WHILE IN ROME

An international group of faithful Roman Catholics has contacted Vatican prelates and all active U.S. cardinals and asked them to publicly affirm the Church's 1961 pronouncement against admitting homosexuals or pedophiles to the priesthood.

Stephen G. Brady, the president of Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. (RCF) issued a statement on Wednesday that was directed to 8 active U.S. cardinals as well as a number of additional American and Vatican prelates. The American cardinals include Roger Mahony of Los Angeles, Francis George of Chicago, Theodore McCarrick of Washington, D.C., William Keeler of Baltimore, Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia, Edward Egan of New York City, Adam Maida of Detroit, and the currently embattled Bernard Law of Boston. They will be traveling to Rome next week with National Conference of Catholic Bishops president Bishop Wilton Gregory and others at the summons of the Holy Father. They will be participating in closed-door meetings with Vatican representatives to address the scandal and damage the Church in America is undergoing due to an increasing number of sexual abuse cases coming to light. A number of prelates have been accused of protecting abusive priests and moving them to other areas, where they have repeated their predatory acts with new victims. An overwhelming number of offenses have involved homosexual acts.

"As a measure of their sincerity in addressing this horrible crisis inflicting so much damage on the souls of the innocent," Brady charged, "we challenge each and every one of these princes of the Church to sign a statement agreeing they will follow the direction of a letter issued by the Sacred Congregation for Religious in Rome." Brady is asking each prelate to affirm the following declaration: "I, ________ Cardinal ________, hereby agree to follow the direction of the letter issued by the Sacred Congregation for Religious in Rome in 1961, which states: 'Those affected by the perverse inclination to homosexuality or pederasty should be excluded from religious vows and ordination'". The Church directive has never been rescinded and is still officially in force.

"If a cardinal is not willing to sign this document," Brady stated, "then there is no point in his traveling to Rome. Moreover, if he travels to Rome and doesn't sign it, I wish he'd do us a favor and just stay there."

Roman Catholic Faithful, Inc. (RCF) is a not-for-profit lay organization, with many religious members, dedicated to promoting orthodox Catholic teaching and fighting heterodoxy and corruption within the Catholic hierarchy.

ROMAN CATHOLIC FAITHFUL, INC.
P.O. Box 109
Petersburg, IL 62675
Phone 217-632-5920
Fax 217-632-7054
Web www.rcf.org

Press Release

Contact: Stephen G. Brady
Phone: (217) 632-5920



[ Report Abuse | Bookmark Discussion ]

From NRO Online The Corner:

BEST NEWS I'VE HEARD ALL DAY: [Rod Dreher] Michael Rose, author of Goodbye, Good Men, the blockbuster expose of homosexuality and heresy in American seminaries, e-mails to say he just filled an order from a Polish monsignor in the Vatican, who ordered four copies and promised to do his best to get a copy into the Holy Father's hands before the pontiff meets next week with the American cardinals. You go, Monsignor! If John Paul reads only chapter four, "The Gay Subculture," he will meet the cardinals with fire blazing in his eyes. In other good news, Regnery Publishing has bought rights to Goodbye, Good Men, which is now out only in paperback, and will be rushing a hardcover edition into stores next month. Regnery's involvement means this extremely important book will get huge distribution and exposure. Posted 1:50 PM | [Link]

1 posted on 4/17/02 5:17 PM Eastern by Dr. Brian Kopp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


34 posted on 04/17/2002 2:49:55 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson