[Lazamataz]

I am somehow troubled by this ruling. I know that it does not actually hurt a real child to have a virtual image of child porn, and I know there is a really fine line as to appearing to be a child and actually being one -- some 12 year olds looking like 21 and some 21 year olds looking like 12 and all -- but damn, something is just wrong here, and I cannot put my finger on it.

[GiovannaNicoletta]

What's bothering you is the knowledge that child rapists will still get off on computer generated child porn and will eventually rape actual, living children when the virtual thrill is gone.

I wonder if the parents of the little rape victims can now sue the hell out of the people who produce this crap like smokers are doing to the tobacco companies?