It's *NOT* altruism. It's offering a return on investment to stakeholders and an investment in goverment to help ensure favourable geo-political, economic climate, and delivery of services (water, power, etc.).
It ought to be a self-realization that as one of these top-tier people, you wouldn't have two dimes to rub together without the low end buying your increasingly pathetic wares and (no) services. That would be altruistic or simply just a willingness to give something back to stakeholders.
As it is, to fatten your bottom line you've unemployed the Americans for slaves in China or some Asian-Pacific paradise, or imported them. To fatten your bottom line you've begged the government to help you negotiate a deal with a foreign nation or taken advantage of a new economic pact. You're not doing all that much, and probably didn't do all that much to start off in the scheme of contribution to humanity. You've just become a successful snake-oil salesman (from Gates to Sheen to Woods) while watching your money make more money. Or you're a lawyer suing some industry for some windfall judgement that'll pay you $50,000 per minute in legal fees. Or some "esteemed" member of government.
Well said, and I fear that the situation will only get worse over time.
The de facto tax strategy of politicians (all Dumbocrats and unfortunately most Republicans.....grrrrr.....) is basically "Tax the rich." But according to the current tax code, "rich" can mean as little as $60,000 per year.
"Tax the rich" is a safe, self-serving strategy for politicians, because the number of income tax free-loaders who vote will always outnumber voters who get screwed on income taxes.
How convienient that you have left out the Republicans in promoting the scam. It's laughable.