This is the kernal of essential truth in this entire piece. We still live in a world of random and evil - not everything is programmed and predictable.
Just because a question is asked doesn't mean there must be an answer. How vain of us to think otherwise.
I think I see Bush wanting to turn this around and how it works out is yet to be seen.
There is an answer but it is not one that a civilized socity is eager to embrace. And it is not lying down quietly so the other side can cut your throat more easily.
Psalm 83 sounds about right.
a. cricket
They must fight until one side loses. Too bad no one thought of that before nukes became common.
It has the ring of truth, because that is what world leaders do in a maelstrom. Churchill's writings of his times in the early 40's are very appropriate now. He spent a great deal of effort just trying to buy time -- time to build his forces and find allies.
Bush is undoubtedly hoping that time will bring new events that will provide a more favorable environment for an outcome that is something less than Armageddon. He has always wanted to keep a lid on things (not just in this locality, but everywhere) in order to pick off enemies one by one. A major conflagration was almost certainly never in his plan, though now it looks inevitable and it will take some time (there it is again) to be prepared fully to deal with that.
Ms. Noonan is close to the administration, so what she writes here is probably closer to the truth of events, as viewed in the White House, than most any others we see daily in the press. He is probably trying to buy time. I sure hope that he is using the time bought to place irresistable force in the region to better control events should they be of the explosive type, as now appears likely.