Why not ? They love the Arabs and envy and hate the Jews.
This is the same as accusing them of antisemitism, and it is a false and malicious charge. To say that I am making up words is pretty foolish, when yours are there for all to see.
In fact, I will go on to ask you why you use the term "House of Jacob," which in case you didn't know it was a euphemism used by antisemitic types in earlier centuries.
You have NO idea what is going on behind the scenes. None. Neither do I, but at least I don't get on the computer and rant about things of which I am not informed.
Any speculation that I do is based on my knowledge of the character of the parties involved. You, on the other hand, seem inclined to make blanket statements of pseudo-fact and throw in a few insults to help your case along.
So, where did I learn my debating? I learned in school and in my life experience, which included people who taught me to not jump to conclusions and to always be civil.
You are slick but transparent. I wrote those comments about George I and Weinberger, which is evident from their careers, choices, and associations. You applied it to George II and tried to call foul. The jury is still out on his presidency, which is headed down at the moment, in great crisis.
You rememember George I's right hand man James Baker don't you ?
Both George I and Weinberger were on TV this week arguing the House of Saud's case. Say, the PLO has some job openings in Washington if you are interested in being a spokeswoman.