[a_witness]

Why not ? They love the Arabs and envy and hate the Jews.

You are slick but transparent. I wrote those comments about George I and Weinberger, which is evident from their careers, choices, and associations. You applied it to George II and tried to call foul. The jury is still out on his presidency, which is headed down at the moment, in great crisis.

You rememember George I's right hand man James Baker don't you ?

Both George I and Weinberger were on TV this week arguing the House of Saud's case. Say, the PLO has some job openings in Washington if you are interested in being a spokeswoman.

[Miss Marple]

Neither of those men is antisemitic. Your comments stand as base accusations.

I have nothing further to say to you, except that I am very, very glad that you are not in charge of foreign policy.

[Texas Cornhusker]

once again, anyone that disagrees with you is a jew-hating arab lover huh? very intelligent and mature, by the way, your not old enough to visit the recruiter, and if you are, someone errored in raising you

[Cold Heat]

Both George I and Weinberger were on TV this week arguing the House of Saud's case. Say, the PLO has some job openings in Washington if you are interested in being a spokeswoman

I saw the interviews. They did not argue the Saudi case as much as they stated a balanced view. I did not like it either and thought it was too Clintonian.

The fact is, that it was a example of good dipomacy. They were probably asked to do it by the administration to try to calm the waters for Powell's effort. This is what diplomacy is all about. It is ugly but necessary.