Your cruel cynicism here is unwarranted. (I’m over 10 years older than you and am suffering from seemingly interminable distractions. I start to track things down, and then forget what I was looking for.)
About what you called a brick: So you have forgotten that altercation you had with another bright friend of mine at his site? That didn’t turn out well for any of us.
My current conversant isn’t that hair-triggered, but it could have been had I not had easy access to a computer and print out.
And I know about your Patrick Henry essay. Jeesh! Did you forget that I edited it for you? I thought you had something new (see below).
I google searched, and that led to this thread. I was hoping to find the online text from your Natural Process so I could provide it for my friend. Natural Process didn’t come up, but this thread did.
And then in my last comment above I forgot to mention to you that this text has evolved. In it you used the words “unconstitutional” treaties. Isn’t it true that in you current thinking, they actually aren’t unconstitutional because the poison pill allows them?
What I realize now is that you could call them “anti-constitutional” treaties. Isn’t that more accurate? It surely is their aims given the racketeering you’ve documented.
But I forgot to mention it — because I got distracted so easily.
What I was hoping you could provide was new material. In the most recent post (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2881830/posts?page=31#30) someone mentioned the “desertification treaty” and you said you “knew it well.” I thought it was something new. I see now you mentioned it in Treaty Law. I’m sorry, but I never retained memory of it. It was spelled out as much at the 1942 treaty.
Thanks for giving me your time despite your misgivings. I really needed the help. Dammit, I AM trying to help you knucklehead. Our concerns are much the same. Save your cynicism for the big fish racketeers and give the smaller fry a bit more latitude.
Correction: The desertification treaty was not spelled out as clearly (or it didn’t leave as strong an imprint) as was The Convention on Nature Protection treaty.
And you are right about my not accessing the http://www.wildergarten.com/wp_pages/articles.html page. I’d forgotten about it. It ties together very well what I’m looking for since you’ve nothing new (until LOST or the small arms get treated as if past). Mea culpa.