Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
"Well,if it was supposed to be kept quite, who leaked it ? Why do we all know about it ? Though I suspect that many newbies here, don't know about it at all."

The lawsuit you are referring to was intended to be kept private, in matter of speaking. Larry kept his name off the title of the lawsuit by filing it under the auspices of another name, Accounts Inc. After Newsweek Magazine ran a polemic piece about this lawsuit for the sole purpose of trying to smear Larry's reputation, Judicial Watch then ran a press release stating the facts of the case, as to not let Judicial Watch detractors and smearers get another final word in otherwise, or gossip about Judicial Watch wrongly

39 posted on 04/09/2002 9:20:50 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
By the way, just in case you are wondering. I took all of the information about Klayman's Accounts Inc. lawsuit against his mother from the October 25th, 1999, edition of the Washington Post.
114 posted on 04/10/2002 9:11:08 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson