Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
"It's just possible that LEO is actually right and you DW apologists are wrong"

I haven't seen more than two posters who subscribe to the notion that maybe the parents did in their little girl. What is really getting to everyone is the way the VD's change their stories constantly.

On that note, here's another question: how could Brenda be on speaking terms with the guy, sell him ahem...Girl Scout cookies twice, chat in his house while the kids played by his pool (unattended), give him her name and home phone number, BUT NOT EVEN KNOW HIS NAME UNTIL MEETING HIM AT DAD'S (as per her testimony)???

A swinger who doesn't know what an "adult party" is. Cut me a break.

96 posted on 04/09/2002 5:42:31 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb
BUT NOT EVEN KNOW HIS NAME UNTIL MEETING HIM AT DAD'S (as per her testimony)???

As per her testimony where? She testified she didn't introduce her friends the first time at Dad's because she didn't know his name until the 2nd cookie sale, where they exchanged names and phone numbers. That sounds very casual, neighbor aquaintance to me.

102 posted on 04/09/2002 6:01:59 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson