Posted on 04/07/2002 9:09:56 PM PDT by Pokey78
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:04:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
How sad to see him spend his retirement nurturing grievances.
Bill Clinton was president of our Republic for eight years, and what diminishes him diminishes us all. If I may speak for his critics, we have no desire to pursue him from now to eternity. We'd hope instead that in retirement he'd achieve a measure of inner peace and historical detachment, as Richard Nixon ultimately did after his presidential disgrace.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
You may not speak for me and that first sentence is ludicrous.
Lest Americans ever forget why the clintons, and all their enablers need to be hectored, hounded, and harried into silence, until "clintonese is only spoken in Hell," look here:
The Holiday *Best* of Bill Clinton & his Friends!
To find all articles tagged or indexed using clintonscandals, click below: | ||||
click here >>> | clintonscandals | <<< click here | ||
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Hillary, click below: | ||||
click here >>> | Hillary | <<< click here | ||
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
If she go's for it, I'll help her campaign! If she'll have me...
country.Saul of Tarsus became Paul the evangelist, author of much of the New Testament. We should pray for a similar miracle in the present instance.
Clinton will find peace, if ever he looks for it.
In the meantime, what about a Presidential Medal of Freedom for Jean Harris and R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.? Even an invitation to the WH would be a start . . .
That is not curious at all. The First Amendment gives carte blance to the expression and even the publication of fallible human opinion. Even--dare I say it--politics. Journalists, OTOH, constantly grouse about the INTERNET because "it isn't fact-checked."Journalism defines itself by the conceit that "the news" is objective. That conceit is antithetical to the First Amendment. Journalist do not, therefore, normally defend the First Amendment, far from it. Journalists consider the First Amendment to be a loophole which should be closed by (hurl alert!) "Campaign Finance Reform."
Print journalism is--ironically, because of the First Amendment--entitled to publish the opinion that they don't need no stinkin' First Amendment. But since broadcasting (as a species of wireless communication) as we know it was created and is sustained by the FCC's censoring all but the few whom it licenses, nobody actually has and vindicates First Amendment rights in broadcasting.
LOL! I got to this line while reading the WSJ, and IMMEDIATELY jumped back to FR to make sure someone had posted it!
I LOVE IT - on the WSJ site they show a copy of the $25,000 check clintbilly wrote to the Arkansas Supreme Court. What's really interesting is that it is drawn against a joint account between him and the evil junior sinator from NY - her name is FIRST on the account!
Can't wait to read the rest of this!
Does Nita Nupress care?
I don't believe that's possible now, or ever will be.Nixon wrote Several "Readable Books"(Check out "Leaders" for starters,which includes Leaders he met when he was Dwight's V.P. ) of ALL his Years in Politics and ALL the Major Leaders of the world he Interfaced with,AFTER he went to San Clemente---Now, in contrast,#42 will write only "A single" Book, that NO ONE will read.It's all downhill from here for him and "His Insides".That's HIS PROBLEM, not mine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.