Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank Zito says he shot police because they broke his door{ unreasonable search and seizure }
The Star Democrat ^ | April 04, 2002 | By: BRIAN HAAS

Posted on 04/05/2002 8:59:46 PM PST by freespeech1

Frank Zito says he shot police because they broke his door

* Outburst comes during evidence suppression hearing; ruling due today

By: BRIAN HAAS, Staff Writer April 04, 2002

FRANK ZITO ... faces death penalty

SALISBURY - "If they didn't break into my door, I wouldn't have shot them," Frank Zito blurted out Wednesday at a hearing to suppress evidence in Zito's murder trial.

Attorneys for both sides argued in Wicomico County Circuit Court whether several pieces of evidence, including several alleged admissions by Zito, should be allowed in the jury trial. Circuit Judge Donald C. Davis said he should issue a ruling on the motion to suppress evidence sometime today.

Zito, 41, of Centreville, faces the death penalty on two first-degree murder charges and several other felony and misdemeanor charges.

Police allege that he shot and killed Centreville Patrolman Michael S. Nickerson and Dfc. Jason Schwenz, of the Queen Anne's County Sheriff's Office. The two officers went to investigate a noise complaint in February of 2001 when police say Zito shot both officers with a shotgun.

Zito has pleaded not guilty and not criminally responsible to the charges against him.

Judge Davis heard testimony from several police officers and Wicomico County Detention Center employees as to what happened Feb. 13 and Feb. 14, 2001.

Maryland State Police Trooper Corey Skidmore was the first officer to testify and the only witness to the shooting. Skidmore said he arrived to back up Nickerson and Schwenz who were trying to get Zito to come out of his house.

After being threatened, the officers got a key to Zito's trailer from his mother, Betty Zito, who was also Zito's landlady, Skidmore said. He said Zito's mother told the officers to get Zito out "by any means necessary."

After the three officers broke through a storm door and entered Zito's screen porch, Schwenz opened the front door with the key, Skidmore said.

As the door opened, Schwenz was hit with the first shotgun blast, followed by Nickerson, who was thrown backward, Skidmore said.

Skidmore said Zito had not seen him on the porch, so he waited for Zito to come out, sprayed his eyes with pepper spray and arrested Zito.

Maryland State Police Tfc. Brian Fisher was the officer who officially arrested Zito after the shooting, Fisher said. He testified that he took Zito away from the shooting scene and back near his patrol car.

Fisher said Zito was yelling "Nazi Gestapo" at the officers and complained that someone broke into his home. Fisher said Zito also told him he had put a shotgun under his couch.

At that point, Fisher said, he arrested Zito and read him his Miranda Rights. Though one of the Miranda Rights is the right to keep silent, Fisher said Zito kept talking.

"'I thought I was protecting my home,' " Fisher quoted Zito as saying. " 'I didn't know they were police until I got outside.' "

Robert E. Williams, an investigator for the Queen Anne's County State's Attorney Office, formally interviewed Zito for about an hour that night, Williams testified. Again Zito was told he could remain silent. But Zito "just started talking," Williams said.

Williams said Zito complained that police were trying to "beat (him) up" and threaten his mother. Then, Williams said, Zito described the events leading up to the shooting.

"'When they went to the second door, I got the 12-gauge and took the safety off,'" Williams said Zito explained. Then, as the door opened, "'I just shot.'"

"'I know I snagged that bastard,'" said Zito, according to Williams.

Williams said Zito talked with very little questioning by him or two other officers present at the interrogation.

Several other officers testified that Zito admitted shooting the two officers with no questioning. Two officers at the Wicomico County Detention Center also testified that they overheard Zito admit to the shooting while talking on the jail's telephone.

Defense lawyers later called Betty Zito to the stand. Wheeled into the courtroom in a wheelchair, Mrs. Zito was too weak to hold up her right hand to be sworn in. She lifted her right hand with her left hand as high as she could while being sworn in.

She testified that her son has his own trailer, which he rented from her. She said his rent is no different from the rent for the eight other trailers on her property.

She said Frank "wasn't so good" on Feb. 13, a condition made worse by the police breaking his storm door. She said police threatened to "tear gas" Zito's home unless he came outside.

She sobbed lightly as she described her frustration that day, trying to get someone on the telephone to help her and her son.

She said the only reason she gave the officers the key to Zito's trailer was so they wouldn't break his door and "tear gas" him.

Then she said she went around the side of Zito's trailer to peer inside and find him. That's when Mrs. Zito heard the "pop, pop" of the shotgun blasts, she said.

As defense lawyer Patricia Chappell wheeled Zito's mother past him and out of the courtroom, he gently put his hand on his mother's knee.

"Goodbye," she said as she passed from the courtroom.

In their closing arguments, defense lawyer Brian Shefferman argued that Zito's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure was violated by the three officers. He said Zito did not consent to the officers coming on his premises even though they entered his enclosed porch.

Shefferman argued that all evidence that came about because of the "illegal" entry to Zito's trailer should be suppressed during the jury trial. Most of the testimony that would be lost if this motion were to be granted would be Trooper Skidmore's description of the shooting and the events leading up to it.

Shefferman also argued that statements that Zito made to officers throughout the night should be suppressed because Zito was injured when he made them. Officers testified earlier that Zito was bleeding from a cut on his face that night. >{?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; unreasonablesearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-392 next last
To: Conservative til I die
Sadly for some here on FR, cops can do no wrong, even when they violate people's civil rights.

Unfortunately, that's a correct statement. However, I'm enjoying myself. Trying to see how many times in a row Roscoe can make wrong or invalid statements. At least he's consistent with them. I think he's trying to set a new FR record..

-The Hajman-
241 posted on 04/07/2002 11:34:46 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense. His defense attorney is going to have the same tough problem selling the militia nutcase spin to 12 rational jurors.

If a criminal breaks into one's house, shooting that person is justifiable as self-defense and defense of the home. This has been upheld by many a case. Yes, you can shoot a person if they try to enter your home illegally. And this is just what the police did. Their title of 'police' doesn't make them exempt from the consequences of criminal behavior.

-The Hajman-
242 posted on 04/07/2002 11:40:10 PM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
[That the life of two policemen is worth less than the door of a trailer porch in the eyes of Zito's apologists says a lot about their priorities.]

So, you don't believe in self-defense?

What a fascinating reply.

The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder. The nebulous suggestion that the shotgunning of the two police officers was legally justified has no quote, cite or link to any alleged statute, naturally.

243 posted on 04/07/2002 11:51:33 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense.

He won't, he can't.

244 posted on 04/07/2002 11:54:39 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
We've heard before the dissembling of the militia nutcases. Even if the police had secured a warrant to detain the criminal, the ideologues would still be applauding Mr. Zito and condemning the police. That's why they are ideologues. "Mebbie they wuz robbers at thu door jes' claimin' to be the police, aholdin' a warrant. Best to be judged by 12 than carried by six, dagnabit!"
245 posted on 04/07/2002 11:55:31 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Hajman; Roscoe
CENTREVILLE - Nearly two weeks ago, in the space of a heartbeat, a man with a troubled history of mental problems was charged with the kind of crime that belies the myth that small towns are safer than cities.
It began with a routine police response to a noise complaint at a trailer park tucked along Centreville's rural fringes and ended with the deaths of two police officers.
Centreville Patrolman Michael S. Nickerson and Queen Anne's County Sheriff's Deputy Jason C. Schwenz expected confrontation.
They didn't expect to die.
Francis M. Zito, the man accused of shooting both Queen Anne's County lawmen, was on probation for second-degree assault against his mother in February 2000. He wasn't allowed to own a shotgun.
But he did.
According to psychiatric records, doctors first tried to exorcise the demons that hijacked his childhood before he was 9 years old with Thorazine, a powerful anti-depressant.
An evaluation included in his court records reports Zito, diagnosed with schizophrenia and manic depression, had been hospitalized a dozen times. To maintain mental stability, he was supposed to take the powerful drug Prolickson every day.
But he didn't.
Court records reveal that his mother, Betty, has filed seven petitions since 1993, asking for emergency evaluations of her son.
She wrote that Zito "threatened to break my bones and hit me." She said he "cursed and called her awful names," that he was "incoherent and out of control," and she never knew when her son was going to hit her "because he goes off for no apparent reason."
In each petition, the judge found "the emergency evaluee has shown the symptoms of a mental disorder and there appears to be clear and imminent danger of the evaluee's doing bodily harm to the evaluee or another."
One mental health evaluation described him as "too dangerous to remain out among others unsupervised."
But he did.
It appeared clear Zito needed to be monitored to assure he took the daily doses of drugs prescribed to help control his erratic behavior.
But he wasn't.
Records show Zito never finished school, though he eventually learned to read and write well enough to earn a G.E.D.
He never held a job.
His mother tried to keep watch over her son. She owned the trailer park where they lived directly across from each other.
But even she was not immune from his rage. On Jan. 18, just three weeks before the policemen died, Zito's violent behavior toward his mother convinced a judge to grant her petition request filed to have her son evaluated at Kent & Queen Anne's Hospital.
He was no stranger there, having undergone four other evaluations at Kent & Queen Anne's and one at the Memorial Hospital at Easton.
There were other signs that Zito needed help. He allegedly stole from his neighbors' mailboxes because he thought they were taking checks he'd won from the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes. He believed former President Clinton owed him money.
A well-known figure around Centreville, Zito often left trouble in his wake as he drifted through town.
On many occasions, business owners ordered him to leave their building.
Centreville Postmaster George W. Schultz said Zito "created scenes in the lobby."
In September, Zito was served with an ex parte order telling him to keep away from a local woman who said he'd called her house and come to her place of employment.
Just the day before he allegedly turned a gun on Nickerson and Schwenz, Zito met with Division of Parole and Probation agent in Centreville and a mental health professional.
According to charging documents, Zito had been ordered to serve three years probation as part of a sentence for the second-degree assault against his mother late in 1998.
In February 2000, Judge John T. Clark III sentenced Zito to four years in prison, with three years suspended, three years probation and 171 days credit for time already served in jail.
The 36-month probation period began June 22, 2000 when he was released from the Queen Anne's Detention Center. A condition of the probation was that Zito be evaluated and receive counseling for psychiatric treatment.
Doug Larrimore, Zito's next door neighbor, said he "slept all day and prowled all night, talking to himself and pretending to shoot at trees and other objects."
Stefan Skipp, who has represented Zito "frequently" in court over the past 15 years, and who entered his appearance for the suspect last week on behalf of the public defender's office, admits Zito has "been in and out of the system for years."
And it is this history of what appears to be a clear pattern of erratic behavior that has left people wondering why Zito was allowed to remain in society without stricter supervision.
It's a complicated answer.
Kent County State's Attorney Robert Strong offered guidelines that dictate what happens if, prior to a trial, a defendant is alleged to be not criminally responsible (NCR) at the time of an offense.
First, the Department of Health & Mental Hygiene must conduct two competency evaluations. If the defendant is found competent and criminally responsible, the case is prosecuted in normal fashion. If the defendant is found not competent, a competency hearing must be held before he stands trial.
If the defendant is found NCR, the defendant must decide whether or not he will accept the finding. If he refuses, the case is prosecuted in a normal fashion, but if he accepts the NCR evaluation, the state reads a statement of facts to the court. If the court accepts the offense and the NCR finding, the defendant is sent to the DHMH to determine if he is a danger to himself or others.
If he is a danger, he remains hospitalized until he is no longer considered harmful and can be granted a conditional release.
The conditions of the release are determined by where the defendant lives, what his after care plans will be and his probation supervision. He is prohibited from having a firearm. If the defendant violates the conditions of the release, the state's attorney is notified and can ask for a hearing to commit the defendant.
Without commenting specifically on the Zito case, Dr. George W. Rever, regional medical director of the Regional Clinics of the Mid-Shore (Kent, Queen Anne's, Talbot, Caroline and Dorchester), admits that there is no simple response to why some mental health patients who appear to be dangerous are allowed to live on their own.
"The courts make the determination whether or not to confine a person who's committed a crime and who appears to have mental problems," said Rever. "Because patients have certain rights, they can't be confined indefinitely."
Rever, who's served the mental health community for more than 40 years, believes a lack of funding is a major part of the equation.
"Prisons and jails aren't set up to treat people who are mentally ill," Rever explained. "Many of them need treatment they can't afford."
He said money for mental health programs is often not a priority when treatment funds become available.
"I share the community's concerns when violence occurs," he said. "But we must be careful not to stereotype the mentally ill. Truthfully, a very small portion of that population commits violent crimes."
Rever suggests a program currently under study in Maryland may offer some solutions. The initiative calls for involuntary out-patient commitment.
"An individual is required to go to treatment and checked to make sure they're taking medication. If they don't show up for an appointment, the alarm goes out."
He said a second approach could allow lawyers, patient advocates and mental health professionals to work with patients to develop advance directives which would get the patient to agree to certain after-care, including appointing an agent to check up on them."
Both initiatives may appease civil libertarians and mental health advocates who vigorously protect the constitutional rights of mental health patients, while also protecting society from patients who exhibit ongoing psychotic behavior and who, despite being repeatedly hospitalized or jailed, refuse to stay on their medication.
Still, many professionals in the field of mental health believe outpatient commitments won't help at least half the diagnosed schizophrenics.
"There was only one way to handle Frank," said Larrimore. "You just had to stay out of his way."

Source: http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=1460280&BRD=2101&PAG=461&dept_id=417987&rfi=8

Thanks to the liberal's crusade of "patient's rights," borderline mentally ill people are allowed to be ignored and deprived of the help they really need.

246 posted on 04/08/2002 12:22:26 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The ideologues can only laud mental cases as their heroes of personal responsibility and successful self-governance.
247 posted on 04/08/2002 12:28:07 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder. The nebulous suggestion that the shotgunning of the two police officers was legally justified has no quote, cite or link to any alleged statute, naturally.

Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense.

He won't, he can't.


I won't need to show how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, because that's not required for something like this, and I already explained how it was self-defense.

-The Hajman-
248 posted on 04/08/2002 12:28:26 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Hajman; Roscoe
Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

Whoops. Never mind, I see it above. (See? I can admit when I'm wrong)

-The Hajman-
249 posted on 04/08/2002 12:33:31 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
[The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder.]

Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

The Grand Jury decide the appropriate charge, Zito's conviction will come at the hands of the petit jury.

I won't need to show how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, because that's not required for something like this, and I already explained how it was self-defense.

No, you've just repeatedly begged the question.

What does your imaginary statutory exception say? Where is the cite? The link?

Not given, naturally.

250 posted on 04/08/2002 12:38:56 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
We've heard before the dissembling of the militia nutcases. Even if the police had secured a warrant to detain the criminal, the ideologues would still be applauding Mr. Zito and condemning the police. That's why they are ideologues. "Mebbie they wuz robbers at thu door jes' claimin' to be the police, aholdin' a warrant. Best to be judged by 12 than carried by six, dagnabit!"

So tell me, would you let anyone into your home that claims to be police and doesn't have a warrant? I'd tell them to get a warrant, and not step a foot inside my house. One has the right to do that you know. BTW, perhaps you don't realize it, but if the police did have a warrant, and did a legal entry with probable cause, then the guy certainally should be dropped in a cell and the key tossed away. Nice ad hominem attack though. Too bad it's wrong.

Tell me, do you believe a person has a right to shoot an illegal intruder in their own home?

-The Hajman-
251 posted on 04/08/2002 12:40:18 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
"According to charging documents, Zito had been ordered to serve three years probation as part of a sentence for the second-degree assault against his mother late in 1998."

Lovely.

At least their latest attempt to create a martyr is using someone who is mentally ill.

Beck and Christine are long forgotten.

252 posted on 04/08/2002 12:44:27 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
Tell me, do you believe a person has a right to shoot an illegal intruder in their own home?

You mean shotgunning two police officers standing on your porch asking you to turn down your stereo, because they "broke your door" to the porch?

No, only a lunatic or a blind zealot could believe such a thing.

253 posted on 04/08/2002 12:49:30 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
No, you've just repeatedly begged the question.

What does your imaginary statutory exception say? Where is the cite? The link?

Not given, naturally.


There it is, the site and the link. This section includes the illegal breaking and entering that the police did. Note carefully the bolded section for this assertion.

-The Hajman-
254 posted on 04/08/2002 12:50:02 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
You mean shotgunning two police officers standing on your porch asking you to turn down your stereo, because they "broke your door" to the porch?

No, only a lunatic or a blind zealot could believe such a thing.


See post #254. Seems the interpretation of the law dissagrees with you. BTW, breaking down the door and forced entry without a warrant isn't legal, independent of who's doing it.

-The Hajman-
255 posted on 04/08/2002 12:52:04 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
How dishonest and lame. That isn't a quote or cite from Maryland's statutes.

Your desperation is showing.

256 posted on 04/08/2002 12:58:32 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
How dishonest and lame. That isn't a quote or cite from Maryland's statutes.

Your desperation is showing.


First you claim only insane people would think that, then when I show you law to back it up, you complain it's not Maryland specific. I'll try to find you the Maryland specific one, but I'm sure you'll find something else to bicker about. You're the desperate one, tossing out ad hominem attacks at every opportunity to try to distract from the main point, and trying to win the argument with death of a thousand cuts. That game don't work with me. If Maryland law goes against that, then I'll freely admit I'm wrong. If it does though, you must admit you're wrong. If you find something else to bicker about, then I'll know that you just want to argue the point and not actually look at the evidence, and all credibility you have will go down the drain.

-The Hajman-
257 posted on 04/08/2002 1:05:27 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
when I show you law to back it up

That wasn't a law. Your sophistries are collapsing.

258 posted on 04/08/2002 1:09:37 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
That wasn't a law. Your sophistries are collapsing.

Yes, it was. It was an interpretation of the self-defense law. Just because you didn't like it doesn't make it wrong.

-The Hajman-
259 posted on 04/08/2002 1:12:52 AM PDT by Hajman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Hajman
It was an interpretation of the self-defense law

Really? Which "self-defense law" was it an "interpretation" of?

Busted again.

260 posted on 04/08/2002 1:15:35 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson