[Hajman]

The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder. The nebulous suggestion that the shotgunning of the two police officers was legally justified has no quote, cite or link to any alleged statute, naturally.

Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

You haven't shown how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, or how he acted in self-defense.

He won't, he can't.

I won't need to show how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, because that's not required for something like this, and I already explained how it was self-defense.

-The Hajman-

[Hajman]

Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

Whoops. Never mind, I see it above. (See? I can admit when I'm wrong)

-The Hajman-

[Roscoe]

[The Grand Jury took only moments to find that the correct charge was murder.]

Interesting. Perhaps you could provide a source which states that the jury found him guilty of first degree murder?

The Grand Jury decide the appropriate charge, Zito's conviction will come at the hands of the petit jury.

I won't need to show how Mr. Zito's life was in any danger, because that's not required for something like this, and I already explained how it was self-defense.

No, you've just repeatedly begged the question.

What does your imaginary statutory exception say? Where is the cite? The link?

Not given, naturally.