Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Part 2: Homosexual Culture Undercuts Priesthood
NewsMax ^ | 4-5-2002 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 04/05/2002 12:32:54 PM PST by Notwithstanding

Homosexual Culture Undercuts Priesthood

Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com
Friday, April 5, 2002
Editor's note: See part one of this series, Anti-Catholic 'Experts' Fuel Church's Scandals.

Father Andrew Greeley called it the "Lavender Mafia," a homosexual underground within the Catholic Church in America that has managed to dominate many of the seminaries and must bear the largest share of the blame for the sex scandals afflicting the church.

Like the gay underground in the British Foreign Office of the past where for scores of years the road to advancement was open only to homosexuals, the Lavender Mafia has been the gatekeeper determining who will be admitted to seminaries and ultimately to the Roman Catholic priesthood.

In Goodbye! Good Men: How Catholic Seminaries Turned Away Two Generations of Vocations From the Priesthood," author Michael S. Rose quotes a former Mundelein seminarian, Joseph Kellenyi, as saying: "The issue was never one of my suitability for ordination. Rather it was that the gay clique had been given veto power over who got ordained."

'Gay Profession'

In his book, "The Changing Face of the Priesthood," the rector of St. Mary's Seminary in Cleveland, Father Donald B. Cozzens, warned that the priesthood was becoming a "gay profession."

And in the seminaries it wasn't merely a preponderance of gay students, but also "a disproportionate number of homosexually-oriented persons," including faculty, he wrote.

That kind of atmosphere, Rose notes, "deters the heterosexual man from continuing to study and prepare for the priesthood."

Rose wonders how can "any healthy heterosexual seminarian expect to be properly formed and prepared for the priesthood when constantly subjected to that which is so clearly contrary to Church teaching and discipline?"

'Threatening Atmosphere'

He asks: "How many heterosexual seminarians, whether orthodox or not, have decided to leave the seminary and abandon their vocations because of the 'gay subculture' they were forced to endure, because they had been propositioned, harassed or even molested? We're not talking here about the presence of a few homosexually-oriented men who conduct themselves with perfect chastity. Rather there exists an intense and often threatening atmosphere."

Indeed, so horrific is the situation that "certain seminaries have earned nicknames such as Notre Flame (for Notre Dame Seminary in New Orleans) and Theological Closet (for Theological College at Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.); St. Mary's Seminary in Baltimore has earned the nickname 'The Pink Palace.'"

Visiting the Gay Bars

At some of the seminaries, faculty and students would don their gay apparel and head for gay bars. In March 2000 the liberal Greeley, often called the church's resident pornographer for his racy novels, testified that seminary professors "Tell their students that they're gay and take some of them to gay bars, and gay students sleep with each other."

Greeley is not alone in exposing the homosexual behavior rampant in many of the nation's seminaries:



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; homosexual; scandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 04/05/2002 12:32:54 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
In another thread I had criticized Fr. Cozzens. Upon reflection, I have read two articles containing excerpts from his book. One lead me to think he was a theological liberal who is a cafeteria Catholic. But this article leaves me thinking he is not so liberal after all. I can now state that I do not know enough about Fr. Cozzens work and perspective to either endorse or ciritcize it.
2 posted on 04/05/2002 12:41:29 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catholic_list
See a list of Catholic related threads.
3 posted on 04/05/2002 12:41:42 PM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I am not a Catholic, but I'm wondering how this could have happened over the recent decades without SOMEONE (other than a handful listed here) blowing the whistle? Were there no signs? Were there no overseers? Was there no accountability in the seminaries? Did those in the pews just keep quiet when they found these things out? Are people (and I don't mean just victims) in the church being bought off for silence?

Are there any priests on FR or any experts on the Catholic church hierarchy who can answer these questions?

I know that in protestant churches abuse can happen too. It's usually male to female, however. And yes, there have been some cover-ups. But there is NO indication from any quarter that protestant seminaries have endured this kind of thing over the last 30 years. (Our seminaries are only accused of having left their first love and teaching liberal theologies - which is true of many of them.) But as to direct abuse, my sense is that in the last decade, Protestant churches are much more willing to discipline and out such offenders. In fact, it's usually done in an ugly way, blasted into the secular press, and rarely follows biblical church discipline standards. We have our own share of problems with "speaking the truth in love." But it seems the Catholic church is having a problem with just "speaking the truth" to begin with.

4 posted on 04/05/2002 12:53:20 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Homosexual culture (along with any other celebrated sin) undercuts (and undermines) everything that is decent in this world.
5 posted on 04/05/2002 12:59:43 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Not being in the shoes of those who have made the decisions, I cannot say why things are the way they are. I think that those in charge gave the "benefit of the doubt" to an imprudent degree. (In a [now failed] effort to avoid the media scandals you mention in protestant churches). We call this "avoiding scandal". Causing a public scandal intentionally is always something the clergy will avoid at almost any cost. Not that this is justified - but it certainly is understandable how the human frailty of the leaders caused them to cover up the existence of this lavander mafia. Of course some leaders may have been (likely) members of the mafia and some may have been blackmailed for hetero or or other offenses and thus covered up to save face.
6 posted on 04/05/2002 1:07:28 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
" but I'm wondering how this could have happened over the recent decades without SOMEONE (other than a handful listed here) blowing the whistle? "

The Church seemingly accepted the ways of the world - don't ask, don't tell. But crimes by gays anywhere, get glossed over. There was a boy killed some time ago, I saw it posted here but not in my paper or the media news. Even the Priest problem is still cast by the media, falsely, as pedophilia. Wonder how much the legal profession raked in because of this - what was their 'advice' to the Church?

7 posted on 04/05/2002 1:09:38 PM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
But even the legal profession could not have been complicit if they were not engaged by the Catholic church to keep things quiet and arrange for payoffs. And isn't it possible that the vast majority of those lawyers were Catholic themselves?
8 posted on 04/05/2002 1:13:37 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
And another (perhaps ignorant) question for you: If there was an implicit "don't ask, don't tell" policy inside the seminaries and parishes on this sin, how many other sins are tolerated within the priesthood?
9 posted on 04/05/2002 1:15:40 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Thanks for this article. Many good priests and laymen have been trying to sound the alarm for several years now. It has fallen on deaf ears, as far as the hierarchy is concerned. That is implicit approval.
10 posted on 04/05/2002 1:16:52 PM PST by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Were there no overseers?

I don't know about all but I do know some seminaries have boards of directors composed of laymen and women, religious. priests and bishops.

11 posted on 04/05/2002 1:20:03 PM PST by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"how many other sins are tolerated within the priesthood"

"don't ask, don't tell" has been accepted by the military and public policy in general for homosexuals. But I imagine a few priests might drink too much sometimes. That is about all I know and don't mention.

12 posted on 04/05/2002 1:24:12 PM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun; Palladin
Your questions and assertions are troubling but not unfair. Not only priests and bishops, but also the Catholic people as a whole are shamed by these events. It shows, once again, that what is worse than evil committed by bad men is the indifference of supposedly good men.
13 posted on 04/05/2002 1:27:47 PM PST by Longshanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Longshanks
Mega-ditto
14 posted on 04/05/2002 1:31:28 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Longshanks
Yes, it seems the average Catholic is bearing the worst of this, while the heirarchy spends their days in court and before the press. I'm sorry for them and this whole mess that simply mars the face of Christ.

I just find it interesting (since I belong to a non-denominational church) that people whine all the time about non-denominational and independent churches not have any accountability structure. This situation makes me wonder what would happen if we did.....

15 posted on 04/05/2002 1:33:48 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
My wife's cousin entered a seminary about twenty years ago with the intention of joining the priesthood. The homosexual advances of many of his fellow seminarians and faculty caused him to abandon his plans.
16 posted on 04/05/2002 1:42:14 PM PST by jpthomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I am not a Catholic, but I'm wondering how this could have happened over the recent decades without SOMEONE (other than a handful listed here) blowing the whistle? Were there no signs? Were there no overseers? Was there no accountability in the seminaries?...

I guessing but I think the problem is that with any organization will attract bureaucrats. People who feel that the organization is the mission, that policy outweighs doctrine. It's possible that the Roman Catholic Church has too many bureaucrats, who would prefer to protect the organization, than undergo a humbling purification.

17 posted on 04/05/2002 2:07:10 PM PST by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
Good analysis. I would only add the old saying "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely".
18 posted on 04/05/2002 2:26:57 PM PST by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I live in Rhode Island. This priest scandal has been all over the news. Everyone is calling these priests pedophiles. I have a simple question:

Suppost my friend has an affair with a 15 yr old high school girl. We all would consider him a horn bag and a dirty old man, but not a pedophile. When a priest has an affair with a 15 year old boy, he is not considered a horny homo, but is instead labeled a PEDOPHILE. In my state 14 years old is the age of constent for statutatory rape.

Listening to the news, all I hear is the press denying the fact that these guys are homosexuals, and insisting that pedophiles are not homosexuals; but the majority of the compliants involve young men, which is not pedophila (IMHO) The talk show hosts go on and saying pedophiles who molest 8 year old girls are not gay, therefore the priests (who happen to have had affairs with 14 year old boys) are not gay. The logic does not hold up.

Everyone is so afraid of offending the powerful gay special interests groups, they are throwing these homo priests to the wolves. Sure the priests used their positions to score, but most of the alleged "victims" were of a consenting age, and are going to get huge cash settlements. How many of this cases were molestations, and how many were consentual? With the millions of dollars involved we will never know ....

Granted IMHO homosexuality is a mental depravity brought on by our messed up society. It has no place in the church, but let's all be a little careful not to jump to conclusions and brand most of these homo horn bags as pedophiles (the scum of the Earth).

19 posted on 04/05/2002 3:02:31 PM PST by ED Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Father Andrew Greeley called it the "Lavender Mafia,"

Good for him (liberal that he is).

20 posted on 04/05/2002 3:39:16 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson