Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2002 10:12:13 PM PST by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2Trievers
Cool.
2 posted on 04/04/2002 10:25:44 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
I don't see commercial American TV over here, but I heard there's all kinds of envirowacko commercials showing ANWR as soaring mountain vistas, etc.

I can't remember where I saw them (probably on NR Online), but Goldberg had some great pics of the proposed drilling area he took last year.

It's basically a flat coastal tundra. Pretty if you like that kind of thing, but this is not like drilling in the middle of Yosemite.

4 posted on 04/04/2002 10:59:01 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
Okay, I feel guilty so I got off my lazy butt. The pics are halfway down in this column: ANWR pics

I don't believe in desroying nature just for the h**l of it, but you can see we're not talking about a hotspot of natural beauty here.

5 posted on 04/04/2002 11:13:13 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
Liberals are imune to logic, and therefore are marked for extinction.
7 posted on 04/04/2002 11:22:39 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
When I was in Alaka I learned that the vast majority of Alaskans were overwhelmingly in favor of drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge. That's good enough for me. Ignore the mainland do-gooders and tart drillin fellas.
9 posted on 04/04/2002 11:50:57 PM PST by LiberalBassTurds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
The ANWR is no more than an artic desert. Besides oil developers can drill the ocean floor without spilling a drop.

Its all about money. Enviromentalst had rather eat dirt than see American oil companies make a dime of new domestic exploration, but sending American money overseas with little hope of retunn is OK. Go figure.

16 posted on 04/05/2002 4:24:40 AM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
What s so special about Arctic Wildlife Refuge at night?

You can pee a yellow icicle?

17 posted on 04/05/2002 4:28:14 AM PST by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
How about a website called ANWR.com. 24 hour live cam coverage of this pristine wilderness of mountains and streams where happy carabou frolic in the meadows. Since most of us will never step foot in this tundra wasteland, we would all be able to see what the enviro-nazis are so hell-bent on protecting. Me, I would just like a little petrol for my environmentally unfriendly SUV.
20 posted on 04/05/2002 4:58:39 AM PST by DancesWithTrout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers;stands2reason;sleavelessinseattle;GATOR NAVY;Brad C.;Bullish;LiberalBassTurds...

ANWAR

Taken from the February issue of Oil & Gas Investor, page 11:

EIA estimates total US production at 5.78 million barrels of oil per day (BOD).
Shell Oil's Brutus offshore platform (Gulf) is expected to peak at 100,000 BOD this year. Production from the Mars, Troika, Ursa, Dianna-Hoover and Brutus offshore Gulf fields could account for 9.7% of total lower 48 oil production by fourth quarter 2003.

Alaska will produce 17.2% of total US production (including Gulf production) in 2003 with the addition of the Colville River, Aurora, Polaris and Borealis satellite fields located on the North Slope.

LET ME BE CLEAR: with TOTAL US production at 5.78 million BOD, the addition of modest ANWR estimates of 1 million BOD, is equal to 17.3% of TOTAL US PRODUCTION


ANWR Fact Sheets http://www.anwr.org/
ANWR Oil Estimates

Myths of ANWR

Arctic Shoreline

ANWR Wilderness

Arctic Oil Technology

Native Alaskans and Development

Jobs,Jobs, Jobs

Caribou in ANWR

Which is the Real ANWR?

National Security

Oil Exports

In 1998 the USGS did a study that concluded that there are between 5.7 billion to 16 Billion barrels of recoverable Oil in the "1002" Area of ANWR. That is a LOT of oil!

and it doesn’t even take into consideration the nearly 200 TRILLION cubic feet of natural gas there (over 150 years supply at the current rate of use in the U.S.)

A little perspective on the size of ANWR development:


An exploration rig on the tundra and the absence of any wildlife in this region


Beautiful Spring day in this coastal plain

Coastal Plain
      spring                                             summer                                       winter

Only 2,000 acres out of 19.5 MILLION are even under consideration for drilling. And those 19.5 million acres are but a FRACTION of the total land mass of Alaska. Also, contrary to dire predictions of the devastating impact on wildlife that would occur when the pipeline in Prudhoe bay, the caribou herd there have actually grown to record numbers.



SITE MAP (background / technology)

http://www.anwr.org/sitemap.htm
FROM http://www.anwr.org/topten.htm

TOP 10 REASONS TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT IN ANWR

1. Only 8% of ANWR Would Be Considered for Exploration Only the 1.5 million acre or 8% on the northern coast of ANWR is being considered for development. The remaining 17.5 million acres or 92% of ANWR will remain permanently closed to any kind of development. If oil is discovered, less than 2000 acres of the over 1.5 million acres of the Coastal Plain would be affected.

2. Revenues to the State and Federal Treasury Federal revenues would be enhanced by billions of dollars from bonus bids, lease rentals, royalties and taxes. Estimates in 1995 on bonus bids alone were $2.6 billion.

3. Jobs To Be Created Between 250,000 and 735,000 jobs are estimated to be created by development of the Coastal Plain.

4. Economic Impact Between 1980 and 1994, North Slope oil field development and production activity contributed over $50 billion to the nations economy, directly impacting each state in the union.

5. America's Best Chance for a Major Discovery The Coastal Plain of ANWR is America's best possibility for the discovery of another giant "Prudhoe Bay-sized" oil and gas discovery in North America. U.S. Department of Interior estimates range from 9 to 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil.

6. North Slope Production in Decline The North Slope oil fields currently provide the U.S. with nearly 25% of it's domestic production and since 1988 this production has been on the decline. Peak production was reached in 1980 of two million barrels a day, but has been declining to a current level of 1.4 million barrels a day.

7. Imported Oil too Costly The U.S. imports over 55% of the nation's needed petroleum. These oil imports cost more than $55.1 billion a year (this figure does not include the military costs of protecting that imported supply). These figures are rising and could exceed 65% by the year 2005.

8. No Negative Impact on Animals Oil and gas development and wildlife are successfully coexisting in Alaska's arctic. For example, the Central Arctic Caribou Herd (CACH) at Prudhoe Bay has grown from 3,000 to as high as 23,400 during the last 20 years of operation. In 1995, the Central Arctic Caribou Herd size was estimated to be 18,100 animals.

9. Arctic Technology Advanced technology has greatly reduced the 'footprint" of arctic oil development. If Prudhoe Bay were built today, the footprint would be 1,526 acres, 64% smaller.

10. Alaskans Support More than 75% of Alaskans favor exploration and production in ANWR. The Inupiat Eskimos who live in and near ANWR support onshore oil development on the Coastal Plain.

RELATED ARTICLES
Bush Renews Campaign For Arctic Oil
Source: AP; Puublished: February 25, 2002;
Author: AP

Fresh from Asia ~ Bush bonks Daschle head with ANWR club
Source: Reuters / Whitehouse.gov; Published: February 23, 2002

Inupiat Views Ignored in ANWR Debate
Source: ANWR; Anchorage Times Editorial;
Author: Tara MacLean Sweeney

INUPIAT LEADER ASKS SENATORS TO . . .Visit ANWR
Source: Anchorage Daily News; Published: February 17, 2002
Voice of the Times

ANWR Showdown -- Liberal Caught Playing Loose With The Facts [My Title]
Source: The Fargo Forum and the Grand Forks Herald; Published: February 14, 2002;
Author: Chris Beachy; John Bluemle

Kerry and Lieberman ignore invitation from native villagers in ANWR
Source: USNewswire; Published February 13, 2002;
Author:| Village of Kaktovik Alaska

ANWR Survey
Source: City of Kaktovik, Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), Web Page;
author: City of Kaktovik

Listening to Alaska
Source: National Driller; Published: September 27, 2001

ANWR and Oil
Source: Town Hall.com; Published April 11, 2001

Bush Is Right: Opening ANWR To Oil Exploration Would Help Consumers Without Hurting Environment
Source: The National Center for Public Policy Research; Published: January 23, 2001
Author: John Carlisle

Time To Permit Oil Drilling In the Arctic Refuge
Source: Heritage Foundation; Published: October 17, 1995
Author: John Shanahan

It has been mentioned that the caribou herd had over tripled near the pipeline!

Seems other species have flourished as well







21 posted on 04/05/2002 5:03:36 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2Trievers
I know some Canadians who worked in Canadian oilfields. You could only get a vehicle in during the winter when the ground was frozen. Winter is when they did all the work.
23 posted on 04/05/2002 5:11:27 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson