What on earth are you talking about?
You stated that "Sparticus"[sic] was somehow involved in making allegations of impersonation. I was was doing the "Spartacus" routine the other day, and mis-spelled it "Sparticus" [sic]. So naturally, I'm wondering if you are referring to me.
As far as any "involvement" in this issue, I don't know what you are referring to, other than my occasional ribbing of you with references to Bogart/Caine Mutiny, which I assume you can take, as it is light-hearted fun.
If you think I have some other involvement, I'm all ears.
Your mispelling was picked up by another as well. Easily missed when you're champing at the bit to jump in.
Do I really have to dissect my statement to you. The reference to Sparticus(sic) was to draw attention through sarcasm to the "innocent" insinuation of hyperbole into a serious allegation. I did not make the statement I made to Vade on a whim. All of the other "charges" were prattle posted by little birds in support of a beleaguered associate. I understand this was done to obscure the validity of my allegation. No-kin, whoever he may be, is not what he appears to be. There exists one successful conjurer of No-kin and that is Vade.
Why are you acting guilty? (Clack! Click!)