Do I really have to dissect my statement to you. The reference to Sparticus(sic) was to draw attention through sarcasm to the "innocent" insinuation of hyperbole into a serious allegation. I did not make the statement I made to Vade on a whim. All of the other "charges" were prattle posted by little birds in support of a beleaguered associate. I understand this was done to obscure the validity of my allegation. No-kin, whoever he may be, is not what he appears to be. There exists one successful conjurer of No-kin and that is Vade.
You are being as clear as mud tonite. Are you suggesting that anyone who makes light of your allegation is "in" on some kind of "conspiracy"? You've got to be kidding, right?
Just to be clear, because I think it would be very easy for someone to misconstrue what you wrote: I am not involved in making the kind of allegation you and medved (?) have made recently. Okay?