No it does not say that abiogenesis is impossible because the wind cannot build a 707. It shows exactly how hard it is for even the simplest living thing to to have arisen. It shows that abiogenesis is scientifically impossible. It shows what real science has found about how hard it is to create the simplest living thing - a small, a very small, self sufficient, reproducing bacterium.
You cannot even give a specific way in which such a combination could ever have occurred, you ignore that such a thing never has been seen to occur. What that article explains, is the science of life as observed by real scientists.
I'll recapitulate your entire arguement for you in brief: Science hasn't been able to produce life, therefore God exists. This is an obvious logical fallacy.