I'll recapitulate your entire arguement for you in brief: Science hasn't been able to produce life, therefore God exists. This is an obvious logical fallacy.
No, I did not say the above nor anything close to it. What I said is quite simple: real science has not only not been able to produce life, it has also disproven that life comes from inert matter and in addition has shown that it is almost impossible for life to have ever arisen from inert matter. Now if you are smarter than Pasteur, the Noble Prize winners who discovered DNA and the many others who have advanced biology from the dark ages in the time of Darwin to where it is now, then it is up to you to prove them wrong and give evidence for your theory. Because you cannot, because you do not even have a hypothesis as to how life might have arisen from non-living matter, you indulge in silly rhetorical arguments.