Brought to you by the Free Republic Network!
Posted on 04/02/2002 9:22:48 PM PST by Bob J
Brought to you by the Free Republic Network!
Here is the RFR schedule for the next couple of months. Please note that effective the week of April 22nd, we will be going to two shows per week, Tuesday and Thursday, same bat time, same bat channel!
April 4 - Congressman Billybob
April 11 - Dr. Mike
April 18 - TrueBlackman
April 23 - DFU
April 25 - Jethro Tull
April 30 - Luis Gonzales
May 2 - Sussa
May 7 - Congressman BillyBob
May 9 - Unspun
May 14 - Dr. Mike
May 16 - TrueBlackMan
May 21 - DFU
May 23 - Jethro Tull
May 28 - Luis Gonzales
May 30 - Sussa
June 4 - Congressman Billybob
June 6 - Unspun
June 11 - Dr. Mike
June 13 - TrueBlackMan
This should be REEEaal interesting!
I wonder if Schippers will reveal details of FBI agent Robert Wright's lawsuit against the Feds about not stopping the 9/11 attacks? There was to have been a news conference on this a few weeks ago that got delayed.
Can we submit questions to the FR radio show in advance? If anyonw knows please tell me. Freepers could come up with some excellent and informed questions to ask Schippers about OKC Bombing and the 9/11 attacks.
Also I would like Schippers to elaborate further about remarks he made on Jim Quinns program about Arab American FBI agents impeding or being a "brick wall" to attemppts to stop 9/11 before it happened. THere is some indication this ARab American FBI agent problem may have occurred in the OKC BOmbing case also.
I would also like to ask Schippers to repeat what he has said before on other radio shows about Senator Inhofe blocking the Senate Trial of President CLinton and what Schippers found out about illegal immigration under Clinton/GOre.
If we cannot get questions to Schippers for the FR program does anyone know how to get questions to Schippers from Freepers for the Jim Quinn radio program? Maybe we should do both if we can.
Was McVeigh the second American in the Meeting with Nichols and Edwin Angeles as reported in the Manila Times February 15, 2002?
Who were the two Iraqis in the same meeting?
Was one al Hussain Hussaini?
The fact that RadioFR has attracted guests like, David Horowitz; Pat Buchanan; Gary Aldrich; David Shippers; Art Linkletter; Frank Gaffney; Grover Norquist; and Col David Hackworth (schedule permitting), is testimony to our effort and the attractiveness of the audience.
Doing a talk show is anything but easy, and certainly not for the thin skinned.
As you and BobJ have said, constructive criticism is much appreciated.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/646261/posts
For doug from upland:
If you ask Schippers the questions and if he answers the questions please try to see if you can get him to elaborate on how he knows- such as if he says McVeigh or Hussaini was in the Phillipines, ask him him how he knows that since the Manila Times articles speculate but do not offer proof about McVeigh and Hussaini being there.
There is a tape recorded interview with Edwin Angeles (Abu Sayeff,Phillipine goverment covert agent) from back in 1995 describing his meeting with Nichols in the possesion of a famous journalist in Maryland that I know. I am not aware that Angeles mentioned McVeigh or Hussain in the taped interview which is referred to in Jones' Writ of Mandamus to the 10th Circuit of Appeals in MArch 1996. But McVeigh and Hussaini could have been there along with an another Iraqi suspected (by Iraq expert Lorie Mylroie) of being an Iraqi intelligence agent named Jafar Osman who was photographed in OKC with Al Hussaini shortly after the OKC bombing.
Another wish I have is that you can ask Schippers is to get him to elaborate on his saying a few weeks ago in an interview with Jim Quinn that some of Hussaini's friends were seen and overhead talking with hijacker Mohammed Atta at a hotel/motel a few weeks before the 9/11 attacks.
I'm aware of this. That is why you should put people on the air who DO make it sound easy as opposed to those that don't.
I do a weekly show and whether you think it's ok or you think it sucks doesn't matter; it is *not* easy and it's *very* time consuming.
You don't care if people think your show sucks? I think you do. Otherwise, why do it? Certainly you hope that the audience is enjoying the program.
We're not talking about people who have STAFF here; we're talking about ordinary folks who work a regular job to pay the bills. I don't have interesting guests hammering my telephone for ear-time and neither do the regulars on RadioFR so that means a lot of scrounging and research that would ordinarily be done by STAFF at a commercial station. A 10:1 ratio of prep to air-time is not out of line for a good show. These are not sports shows where people can babble endlessly about nothing and there's always more nothing to talk about.
Once again, I understand all this. I simply do not believe Anna and Merc would turn down a more frequent show for those reasons and until it is stated outright that they did I will continue to think so. The point is that you have one show on Radio FR that actually sounds professional. If I heard Anna and Merc on a commercial station, I wouldn't bat an eye. If I heard some of the others on the lineup, I would wonder what the program director was smoking. The difference in quality is clear. It isn't simply a matter of opinion. It is objective reality. I don't see why with an expansion you wouldn't seek to exploit obvious and unique talent instead of continuing to give voice to the mediocre.
Far be it from me to suggest that the ladies wouldn't be up to a more frequent show; but it would be nicer if you made a suggestion for your favorite show with a smile instead of wise-cracks from your arm-chair about the shows you don't like.
Whether my tactics are sound or not, the point remains that a question was posed and not answered. While a weekly show would certainly tax the time and might stress out the LA duo, I find it hard to believe that they would turn down an offer such an offer. There must be another reason, other than the ones stated, why a weekly show was not considered. I cannot imagine what the reason could be but I would like to know. I think the audience is entitled to know.
This entire operation runs virtually as a philanthropy for everybody involved except the listeners and the hosts are hardly in a position to act as philanthropists, myself included.
Yes, I know. All the more reason to showcase the best talent you have rather than waste everyone's time with folks who obviously can't cut it.
If you want to see any particular show succeed, it would be more productive to make your criticisms known to the appropriate parties responsible for RadioFR privately.
Okay, so I am wrong tactically. Private or public, the point remains the same and the question of why Anna and Merc are not on more frequently is still pending.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.