creation scientist Dr. Kent Hovind ... A degree mill from someone's basement in Colorado Springs.
Well. How 'bout Dr. Michael Behe?
Why don't you check out his background and what he has to say.
ML/NJ (who has a couple of degrees from RPI)
Behe is certainly far more credible than Hovind as Behe attempts to engage the science as real science. However, I find that Behe engages in several dubious rhetorical tricks and circular logic in his work. I don't find him at all convincing. The whole irreducible complexity argument is a fallacious form of logic - argument from ignorance.
There are some fine responses to his "Darwin's Black Box" available - written by more articulate people than I - that show that Behe's been left behind by the science.