To: smith288
1) Take a deep breath
2) Navigate the screen a bit and play with the links, its not hard
3) Ask questions, I would be glad to help you all.
4) Not to nit pick but you all had a week to look around as Jim R put the beta up for consumption on the header of the old site...
8 posted on
03/30/2002 8:55:27 AM PST by
smith288
To: smith288
Not to nit pick but you all had a week to look around as Jim R put the beta up for consumption on the header of the old site... I won't nit pic either.
The new design is terrible. I did go look at the "beta" - once. That was enough.
I don't know where you got your ideas from, but those who are critics of their own work are not to be trusted. The proof of the pudding is what the audience thinks.
If the new interface were a Broadway show, it wouldn't play a second night - depite all the work the actors and directors had put into it.
ML/NJ
54 posted on
03/30/2002 9:28:13 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: smith288
Yeah, I looked at the beta, too, and quickly decided to use the old interface.
If the switchover was ready to go, we should have had some time to acclimatize to the NON beta version.
65 posted on
03/30/2002 9:38:30 AM PST by
SarahW
To: smith288
Yes, the beta was put up for trial. I didn't like it then, either.
86 posted on
03/30/2002 10:34:51 AM PST by
jimtorr
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson