[Jesse]

You wouldn't look like such a damn fool if you put some thought into what you are saying.

And you wouldn't sound so much like a barbeque infatuated empty ten gallon hat Texan if I could figure out what in the H you were talking about.

Let me repeat, reaaal slow. Bush has been a big government shill since his election. In signing CFR, he explicitly violated his oath of office...he doesn't even deny the bill is unconstitutional, for crying out loud. He said he would veto it as a candidate. So how is it exactly that I am supposed to have any more respect for the liar Bush as compared to the liar Clinton?

[fightinJAG]

Just a little point of fact here, since facts matter. The bill President Bush signed is not the same as the bill candidate Bush said he would veto. There were some compromises made during mark-up.

[Texasforever]

And you wouldn't sound so much like a barbeque infatuated empty ten gallon hat Texan if I could figure out what in the H you were talking about.

Did Ronald Reagan violate his oath when his DOJ defended Roe v wade when he stated it was an unconstitutional law? You can't have this oath argument both ways. If a president violates his oath by signing a law he feels may be unconstitutional then a president violates his oath by enforcing ANY law he feels may be unconstitutional. If your definition of the oath is correct, Every president from Washington to the present time should have been impeached.