Skip to comments.
Senator Perata Proposes Nickle Tax on Bullets
KTVU/Fox2 News ^
| 3/28/02
| Randy Shandobil
Posted on 03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by gc4nra
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 last
To: Brellium
" Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. Although I must admit a nickel a bullet is a tad extreame."Would you mind explaining what the hell you're babbling about?
To: Travis McGee
Now I know it's around here somewhere. Dang it, where did I leave that kite kit?
To: Travis McGee
How about warning labels printed on the side of every bullet?
Just make sure the ATF's bullets have the warnings.
To: Travis McGee
California is a "may issue" CCW state. In practice it means the only people who can get a CCW permit issued to them are politically connected friends of the sheriff or police chief, campaign contributors, and prominent celebrities. The masses can't usually get one even if they have a valid reason. Here in California this leaves law abiding gun owners illegally packing their pieces since its virtually impossible to be licensed to carry them and besides why in the world would you want the gun grabbers in this state to know you're armed to begin with. Don Perata who has such a CCW permit enjoys a benefit he thinks ordinary Californians shouldn't be allowed to have. The politics of gun ownership in "may issue" states lend themselves to this kind of abuse and corruption.
To: pocat;gc4nra;Travis McGee
Have you ever done any lead moulding?
165
posted on
03/31/2002 7:37:42 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
To: Myrddin
There may be an unintended consequence lurking in this stupid "bullet tax". A box of 50 .44 Mag goes for $15. A box of 500 .22 goes for $10. Add the "bullet tax" and the .44 Mag costs $17.50. The brick of .22 goes for $35. The center fire rounds cost 17% more. The .22 costs 250% more. Perhaps this will fuel sales for more center fire handgun ammo. Then they'll just come back for "round 2" and either raise the tax or base it as a percentage of the cost of the bullet. The tyrants will just keep pushing until they are finally told "no", one way or another.
Frederick Douglass summarized this situation well: Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.
166
posted on
03/31/2002 7:48:14 PM PST
by
Mulder
To: goldstategop
Tyranny requires a disarmed peasantry.
The needs of a senator who is disarming the peasants for their own good are greater, so of course he must have a carry permit.
To: B4Ranch
Not in a while, but it's not something one forgets.
To: RightWhale; ElkGroveDan
Just bought a box of 550 [10% extra, free!] for $9.95. Add .05 X 500 and it becomes $34.95. This tax would actually be dangerous! It would decrease safety because people will be less likely to practice at the range. We know that practice increases safety. People who don't practice may not be able to hit the intruder, or be uncomfortable with their guns. Also, ammunition becomes stale over time. While blowing off old rounds at the range is fine, you don't want to rely on them if you might need them.
169
posted on
04/01/2002 9:11:28 AM PST
by
Gophack
To: Travis McGee
I think that the Kali legislature (all dem) will pass this nickel tax easily. What we think will have zip to do with it. Actually, it'll be harder to pass than you might think. Many of the Democrats represent the Central Valley which is becoming increasingly conservative. They will abstain or vote no -- or just won't be there, developing food poisoning that keeps them in the bathroom. The gun grabbing Republicans may oppose it because it's a tax.
If it passes, I don't think Davis will sign it. It will bring gunners to the polls. He'll sign it next year if he wins in November.
We HAVE to elect Bill Simon.
170
posted on
04/01/2002 9:16:19 AM PST
by
Gophack
To: Gophack
ammunition becomes stale over time It would. The chemicals inside are designed to be reactive, both the primer and the powder, and they will react slowly if left to sit, just like photographic film that you should store in the fridge. Dynamite becomes unstable when it ages, and many modern powders have the same active ingredients. If someone hands me a box of old 45 ACP ammo, I will remove the bullet [sometimes it is welded in place due to corrosion, so it takes quite a bit of force to free], dump the powder, carefully remove the primer [which may be inert, but maybe not], clean the casing, and reload as usual. Look for signs of corrosion on the cartridge.
To: gc4nra
Perata wants the legislature to put the tax idea on the November ballot. I predict that Davis will find a way to kill this idea.
If y'all are old enough to remember (I was just a snotty-nosed beer-drinking college kid.) There was a handgun ban on the 1982 ballot. That year, Republican George Deukmejian beat Democrat Tom Bradley in their race for governor by a mere 100,000 votes. That was one vote for precinct statewide. Does anyone think that gun owner turnout against the ballot measure had anything to do with it?
Does anyone think Davis and South are dumb enough to let this happen again? Let's hope so.
To: RightWhale
I have shot WW2 surplus .45 in nickel plated steel cases that was 40 years+ old, and it all fired. I have shot tons of 20+ year old surplus 5.56mm, it all worked.
To: gc4nra
This Perata jerk also carries a CCW. Here's the Drudge link:
http://www.nrawinningteam.com/calnra/perata/perata3.gif
174
posted on
04/01/2002 11:49:34 AM PST
by
zoyd
To: gc4nra
Here's a pull-quote from the story on Drudge's page:
Perata, D-Oalkand, said he wants the money to pay for hospital trauma centers, some of which are facing budget problems. "There's no reason why the general public should be paying for gunshot victims. It is an avoidable injury. It is a preventable injury and therfore I think it's fair to fix a very small tax on the sale of bullets," Perata said.
Now, substitute "AIDS/anal intercourse" for "gunshot." As far as I'm concerned there's no reason the general public should be paying for AIDS if contracted through sodomy. It's an "avoidable, preventable" illness. Instead of worrying about bullets Perata should be imposing a "buggery tax" in the San Francisco-Oakland area.
To: Travis McGee
20 year old better work, even 30 year old, I still have some in the box. Actually, I have no experience with old ammo failing to fire, but maybe 40 years isn't old. It's just that one box of 45 ACP from the 40s looked so bad I pulled the bullets and put them in the tumbler with the casings and then reloaded the sparklingly cleaned brass. I forget how I dealt with the primers, I'm thinking woodstove, but they got replaced, too.
To: zoyd
Please read my comments afte the article and click on the link, it's from the Gun Truths website.
177
posted on
04/01/2002 2:47:47 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: B4Ranch
No, but I'm curious about it.
I plan on reloading for my .308 this summer - mostly for my own enjoyment, but also in case idiots like Perata get their way.
Brass, powder and primers can be had in large quantities, but bullets would seem to be the hardest component to replenish. Would un-jacketed bullets be feasible in my bolt-gun? Or is there a way to mould AND jacket them? Any info you have would be very helpful!
178
posted on
04/01/2002 4:18:32 PM PST
by
pocat
To: pocat
http://www.reloadammo.com/ is a great site. http://www.reloadammo.com/relcast.htm/ is about casting your own. There is tons of info on casting different lead bases. Take your time, be careful and have lots of fun.
179
posted on
04/02/2002 4:44:21 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
To: Travis McGee
I've been told that a constant cool temperature is the trick to keeping old ammo good.
180
posted on
04/02/2002 4:49:17 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson