Skip to comments.
Senator Perata Proposes Nickle Tax on Bullets
KTVU/Fox2 News ^
| 3/28/02
| Randy Shandobil
Posted on 03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by gc4nra
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
Here we go again CA Freepers!
Perata is the same guy that brought us SB23(the so called "Assault Weapons" ban)
OBTW, he has his CCW, can we say Limousine Liberal boys anfd girls! Click here for the story
1
posted on
03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: AnnaZ; Mercuria; rebuildus; Cortez; abigail2; HangFire; Lady Jenn; Outraged; Kithlyara...
ping!
2
posted on
03/29/2002 2:08:45 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: Gophack; TheAngryClam; BibChr; CalGov2002; Brad's Gramma; Dan from Michigan; broomhilda; .38sw
ping!
3
posted on
03/29/2002 2:10:05 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: gc4nra
Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland ..Isn't OAKCRAPLAND a Communist city of REP . LEE?
4
posted on
03/29/2002 2:10:22 PM PST
by
KQQL
To: gc4nra,Travis McGee,Squantos
I will be attacked by those who hate gun control. I know that. I'll reserve my comments.
5
posted on
03/29/2002 2:10:33 PM PST
by
pocat
To: gc4nra
Reload your ammo! Is he going to tax primers, powder, and projectiles?
6
posted on
03/29/2002 2:12:37 PM PST
by
nomad
To: gc4nra
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. Although I must admit a nickel a bullet is a tad extreame.
7
posted on
03/29/2002 2:14:12 PM PST
by
Brellium
To: pocat,45Auto
BLOAT, cache, and Take Names!(Here's one more name for the hall of shame.)
To: codebreaker;sirgawain; SLB; GEC, gundog; harpseal; DWSUWF; Wild Game; Fiddlstix...
ping!
9
posted on
03/29/2002 2:14:57 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: gc4nra
Just bought a box of 550 [10% extra, free!] for $9.95.
Add .05 X 500 and it becomes $34.95.
Maybe 5000 22s is a lifetime supply. Then add the .45s. They might collect $250 tax over 50 years on the 22s, and $20 per year from the .45s, and that is from just one person. Multiply that by all the others who would pay such a tax. Obviously this will swell state coffers to an amazing degree. We're talking tens of dollars.
To: KQQL
Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland ..Isn't OAKCRAPLAND a Communist city of REP . LEE?
No, she's up the road in Berkeley!
11
posted on
03/29/2002 2:16:14 PM PST
by
gc4nra
To: gc4nra
Note how it's never "
to control guns"... it's "
to protect the children", or in this case, it's "
to help the hospitals".
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, as long as I can say it: every gun owner should buy a box of ammo for each gun he owns, every single month of the year.
When the gun-grabbers come, they won't go for the guns, they'll go for the ammo. This jerk is just the harbinger.
To: gc4nra
I have a better idea. How about a nickel per pound tax on verbal flatulence. Idiots like Perata could turn out to the goldmine that balances the federal budget.
Seriously, lunatics like this one are a standing threat to the Bill of Rights, and every freedom we enjoy. They would tax into oblivion everything they disagree with.
13
posted on
03/29/2002 2:17:00 PM PST
by
ZULU
To: Brellium
Forget the nickel, that's the "camel's nose".
If crime is not magically stopped after the nickel tax, (It won't be, and Perata knows it as well as we do), then it will be even easier to raise the existing tax to fifty cents or five dollars a bullet.
And of course, possession of an "untaxed bullet" would be subject to mandatory minimum prison terms.
To: gc4nra
Good work gc, thanks for the ping;-)
15
posted on
03/29/2002 2:17:39 PM PST
by
HangFire
To: Travis McGee
Unconstitutional - but since when has that stopped these petty little tyrants? This madness is currently confined to California - but it will spread like an incurable virus to the whole country if these bastards are succesful here. They are setting the stage for some very ugly times - they know not what they do - or maybe they know very well what they do.
16
posted on
03/29/2002 2:18:02 PM PST
by
45Auto
To: pocat
This socialist is following in the footsteps of Salman Rushdie's effort at a second book ......."Buddah Su*ks"..............bad publicity move didn't help Salman's popularity either.
Stay Safe !
17
posted on
03/29/2002 2:18:43 PM PST
by
Squantos
To: RightWhale
Forget the quoted nickel! If it's a nickel this year, it can and will be ten a bucks round in a few years.
To: gc4nra
Ever since Los Angeles passed a law by Councilman Mike Feuer (rhymes with 'der Fuherer') which required purchasers of ammunition to provide a fingerprint, I have purchased all my ammunition on-line. One of my favorites is Cascade Ammunition.
I will never give Mr. Feuer a thumbprint, although I do reserve the right to use another finger.
Ammunition (still) is legal to purchase by phone, fax, internet, e-mail, snail mail, smoke signal, and carrier pigeon. Brought to your door by your friendly UPS man.
--Boris
19
posted on
03/29/2002 2:20:44 PM PST
by
boris
To: Brellium
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, Every tax is a bad thing. I'll never pay a tax on bullets until people take heed of Joslyn Elders' recommendation to make safer bullets.
20
posted on
03/29/2002 2:21:39 PM PST
by
Renatus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson