Posted on 03/28/2002 8:02:29 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
SUMMARY: A 17-year-old Denver girl was viciously slashed Tuesday afternoon, and the word "dyke" was carved into her forearm with a razor.
A 17-year-old Denver girl was viciously slashed Tuesday afternoon, and the word "dyke" was carved into her forearm with a razor, media outlets in Colorado report.
According to the Rocky Mountain News and ABC News, April Mora was walking to a store through an alley near her house at about 2 p.m. Tuesday, when she encountered three teen-age white males in a black Honda. When Mora stopped to look at the car, the teens began calling her "dyke" and hazing her, and Mora gave the passengers a dirty look. The driver then pulled over, and two of the teens got out and dragged Mora to the ground, one holding a knife to her throat.
"Two guys got out of the car, and (one) held me down, while the other guy was cutting something in me," Mora told ABC. "The driver was yelling stuff to them and telling them what to do."
Mora's face was repeatedly slashed, and the letters "RIP" were cut into her stomach. When she screamed, the Rocky Mountain News reports, one of the men flicked her tongue with the blade. The boy with the knife said: "You're lucky we don't rape you."
After awhile, the driver called the others back into the car, leaving Mora face down and covered with blood. Mora, who lives with her girlfriend's family, made her way home, where the Quintana family called an ambulance.
According to Denise de Percin, head of the Colorado Anti-Violence Program, Mora was released and is not in any danger of losing her life. Although the wounds may have been skin-deep, they were extensive and frightening to experience. A photo in the Rocky Mountain News shows the face of an attractive young woman, with close cropped hair, and numerous red welts across her forehead and cheeks.
"I was scared," Mora told the News. "I didn't know what these guys were going to do."
Although the Mora attack was unusual, de Percin said that violence against gay and lesbian youth is common in Colorado, as in fact it is everywhere. The state has been the scene of two high-profile crimes, the murder of Fred Martinez Jr., and the assault on Kyle Skyock in Rifle.
Last January, de Percin reports, 16-year-old Kapree Brown of Denver was beaten up by over a dozen assailants. "People beat you up and leave physical scars," said Brown. "But when it's because of who you are, it's the emotional scars that stay with you forever."
There's a matter of degree of course, which you are quite aware of or you wouldn't be carrying your example to the ridiculous. Obviously 500 piercings in a single ear (or lip, nose, what have you) is much more extreme than a single hole.
While reading a Razz post, I can almost catch a fleeting glimps of a giant PETP banner (as in "People for the Ethical Treatment of the Pierced") hanging on the back wall of the all night tatoo/naval-piercing/internet-cafe from which the posts undoubtedly hail.
True or not we'll never hear the end of it.
You prove my point. Nowhere in this thread have I judged the appearance, either pro or con. Frankly, I myself find lip/tongue/nose piercings to be rather nauseating, especially if taken to the extreme that they often are.
However, that's my personal taste. Just like the fact that I like to see women in dresses, dislike baggy pants and sweats (the hip-hop look), etc.
That's a hell of a lot different than implying that anyone who has a [insert appearance that you find distasteful here] is a lying psychopath ready to slice themselves up at any moment.
My Tawana Brawley BS meter is registering on this one, though .
Actually, I think he was making the observation that someone willing to poke holes in their flesh (self inflicted wounds) for social gains would have fewer qualms about repeating the ritual with other implements (a knife or razor ?) if the possibility of social gains was strong enough (which in this case it clearly is). I think it's an accurate observation as well as an honest assesment of human nature.
Just because the location of the piercings changed from ears to nose to lips to wherever and he doesn't approve of the new location, doesn't mean one is a piercing (or self-mutilation) and the other isn't.
The amount of nerves concentrated in the lips, the tongue and the nose (a very dangerous nerve cluster there, by the by) compared to the nerves in that floppy part of the ear ( I'm sure there's a real word for it :) make the decision to poke a hole in that area and stick a piece of metal through it a bit more significant. It is a greater sacrifice with a greater amount of pain and it requires a distinctly different type of personality. It's far from a seasonal migration of body holes.
I really love the ironic juxtaposition of Razz' relativistic comments right under your photo.
It was a jealous landlord. He hired two thugs to do it. Gov. Pataki actually stiffened the penalties for assault in her honor. Apparently the three people involved got off lightly because she wasn't murdered --only disfigured. Pataki commented that a wallet thief could have served more time.
I just did some research on this as my curiosity was piqued and she actually doesn't look to bad now considering what was done to her. Last year she was a technical advisor to a made-for-TV movie about the ordeal.
Reduccio ad absurdam is a standard and accepted tool in the debate armentarium. It's an exercise in logic and consistancy.
But you knew that. Please stick around, relativists make such fun opponents.
If you were a fencer, Razz would be naked with a pile of shredded clothing in a circle around him.
Funny you mention that because, for some reason, that picture brings Chelsea to my mind. I think it's the lower lip.
Seriously. I can't explain it. It's how I see the thing.
BTW, anyone care to guess the gender? I haven't a clue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.