Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Pray tell,.. enlighten us to the responsibilities of the three branches of our Government. Even though you do not know the educational level of, nor the Government experience some here have,.. please educate us all. I'm sincerely interested in your opinion and views on how each branch should have responded to the CFR issue.

I would be surprised to learn that anyone with significant government experience would believe the Supreme Court is the only branch tasked with considering constitutional questions.

335 posted on 03/28/2002 10:50:06 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
I asked you this: "I'm sincerely interested in your opinion and views on how each branch should have responded to the CFR issue.

I get this from you: "I would be surprised to learn that anyone with significant government experience would believe the Supreme Court is the only branch tasked with considering constitutional questions."

Ho-kay.... I'll check back later to see if you gave a tad more definitive explanation. Thanks in advance!

357 posted on 03/28/2002 11:01:56 AM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion
I would be surprised to learn that anyone with significant government experience would believe the Supreme Court is the only branch tasked with considering constitutional questions.

Congress is not provided with the authority nor duty to judge whether previous acts of Congress are constitutional. Nor does it provide any member of Congress with the authority to prevent any unstoppable majority of his peers from unconstitional actions. Nonetheless, since any member of Congress has the authority to vote against legislation that is unconstitutional, they have the duty to do so.

Likewise with a president's veto. I don't think anyone would argue that the President has the authority to veto legislation he doesn't like but has some obligation to sign legislation that's unconstitutional. As he is given the authority to veto unconstitional legislation that comes before him, he has the duty to use such authority. Although the Court, unlike the other two branches, has broad powers to strike down legislation which, despite being unconstitional, has previously gotten past the other branches, such power is intended to act only as a 'safety check', and is not intended to be the main means by which the Constitution is upheld.

679 posted on 03/29/2002 9:32:39 AM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson