Is this what the choice has come down to? I have to choose between a candidate who makes no pretense of conservatism/Constitutionality, or choose one who does it behind my back. Well, I wouldn't give a fart for either one. If I have to give up my principles for the lesser of two evil choices, then let's elect the worst SOB and get the revolution started, because that's where your kind of thinking is going to eventually get this country.
Have a spine and vote for someone with character, honesty and above all moral principles. Even if that results in a temporary setback, in the end right will prevail. If we deep making excuses for the bad behaviour of any elected official, we will reap what we sow.
In 2000, you had a choice...for Constitutionality (though not for "conservatism"...since "conservatism" today means Big Government). And not pretend Constitutionality, either. The Real Deal of Constitutionality.
Harry Browne would have absolutely followed the Constitution. He'd have shut down the federal government to do it (since 90% of what the federal government does is unconstitutional). But he would have followed the Constitution.
If I have to give up my principles for the lesser of two evil choices, then let's elect the worst SOB and get the revolution started, because that's where your kind of thinking is going to eventually get this country.
Are you so sure of your revolution? They know how to turn up the water slowly so we don't even know we are boiling.
I see the Democrats directly giving the people free medical, long vacation time, free housing, and a high minimum wage. Who is going to complain? When business leave the country or fail, they will be blaimed for being too greedy. The government will step in to fill the needs and soon you will have the Soviet States of America. But as long as you have "Survivor" on the tube (government funded), Academy Awards every year (with politically correct acceptance speeches), and a good late night talk show host (who belittles and demeans the right people), who cares?