Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wcbtinman
Is this what the choice has come down to? I have to choose between a candidate who makes no pretense of conservatism/Constitutionality, or choose one who does it behind my back.

In 2000, you had a choice...for Constitutionality (though not for "conservatism"...since "conservatism" today means Big Government). And not pretend Constitutionality, either. The Real Deal of Constitutionality.

Harry Browne would have absolutely followed the Constitution. He'd have shut down the federal government to do it (since 90% of what the federal government does is unconstitutional). But he would have followed the Constitution.

310 posted on 03/27/2002 8:19:02 PM PST by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: Mark Bahner
"In 2000 you had a choice..."

Yep, and I fell for the "vote for a 3rd party candidate, and we'll get Gore" routine. Well, I turned the other cheek and got that one slapped too.

But this is ugly on my face, not stupid. The Republicans, and Bush in particular are now a distant memory for me. I will be looking closely at Harry Browne, and others of his ilk.

311 posted on 03/27/2002 8:29:37 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

To: Mark Bahner
Harry Browne would have already been impeached.
314 posted on 03/27/2002 10:58:33 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson