[A CA Guy]

for 222 & 223!

So you would have preferred that instead of the way we do stuff in this country now you would have rather had a couple of thousand amendments added to the Constitution.

Fine, a large majority did not agree with you and thought the best way to keep the reverence of the original and yet deal with today was to do what they do now.

Without getting flippant about it, please think about it and give your preferred method for dealing with the Constitution as we move into the future of our tomorrows.

I'm not being sarcastic when I say you would have to be dreaming if you think they would just go with your interpretation of the original and let every SIN run wild in the name of freedom. If they could not use their laws as they do now they would simply patch new amendments before they end their current method. IMO

Happy Easter to you and your family David.
God Bess You All In This Holiday Season and every other day as well.

[dcwusmc]

You are an absolute liberal whore with your "living Constitution" crapola. The reason they want to interpret the Constitution out of existence is for exactly the reasons you like it... namely that the Constitution is a set of CHAINS ON GOVERNMENT, not on the people... and LIBERAL WHORES CAN'T STAND A FREE PEOPLE. Get thee to DU where all your other whorish buds hang out and stop trying to impede the restoration of the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, where it LIMITS GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE IN PEOPLE'S LIVES... By about a dozen orders of magnitude compared to what your ilk have foisted on us.