[dcwusmc]

You just keep on with your moral liberal mantra about the LIVING Constitution. You are a liberal who would be better off at DU than at a website dedicated to the Constitutional Republic we were given by the founders. And to the RESTORATION of the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land. You and your ilk are filth, suited to do nothing but tear down our Republic and make us a mirror image of every rotten socialist nanny-state country that ever existed....

[A CA Guy]

Nobody is doing away with the Constitution, but it would be radically changed by amendments if they went the route you prefer.
The negative side of all the amendments would be the diminishing of the document to where it would only be an old piece of paper.

I am paraphrasing the Congress site on this issue.

As far as liberal, look in the mirror. If you are for things most people know is wrong from simple ethics, you are a moral liberal. Such as in your stance on drugs as I have read you.

No matter how you refer to the Constitution, it was written in the 1700s to serve the beginning of our country. It was the beginning and cornerstone of where we started. Nobody knew the future in the 1700s to create the perfect Constitution that could fully serve all future needs. It was determined to handle it as the country has. As I stated, at times it looks like a yoga move in their interpretation, but I can see where how they handle it is not that bad compared to 13,000 amendments.