Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
This suit for reparations is going nowhere. The reasons why it will be rejected are stated in the article. The strongest and most basic reason for its failure is passage of time.

If you wait 200 years to file suit, even on a claim that would habe been legitimate, you lose. It's called "laches," the doctrine of unnecessary delay. Any competent, unbiased lawyer would agree with this point.

Congressman Billybob

Click here to fight Shays-Meehan.

Latest column: "Does Anybody READ the Constitution?"

12 posted on 03/26/2002 2:41:49 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Of course you are correct, but...

"The claimants named CSX because slave labor was used to construct portions of some U.S. rail lines under the political and legal system in place more than a century before CSX was formed in 1990," the company complained. "Courtrooms are the wrong setting for this issue."

"Whatever claims they are alleging, are too remote or attenuated from the direct conduct of slavery to be able to have a legal claim," said Behrens, who predicted the suit would be dismissed or, perhaps, settled out of court.

The smell of money is in the air, as these companies will capitulate just to be left alone.

14 posted on 03/26/2002 3:04:43 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
I hope that there is some kind of "binding" court decision made on this thing whether it be in rejecting the suit or in hearing it out -- as long as they come to the correct decission. In other words, once the legal option is eliminated we'll stop hearing about this crock of ----.
21 posted on 03/26/2002 4:07:09 AM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
If you wait 200 years to file suit, even on a claim that would habe been legitimate, you lose. It's called "laches," the doctrine of unnecessary delay. Any competent, unbiased lawyer would agree with this point.

Juanita Brodrick couldn't charge Clinton with rape due the the statute of limitations, I believe 7 years? It seems as though an overdue paycheck limitation would have run out as well. If not, the *dead* slave owners who owe could be sued, not his innocent decendants or people who's relitives weren't even in the country at the time. It would be making someone pay a bill that they didn't owe.

42 posted on 03/26/2002 7:35:04 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson