Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
The guest on the Canadian radio show had been huffing glue. Don't hold your breath waiting for his prediction to come true. Bush's appointees are mostly liberals.

Bush can't be compared to Reagan. W has never worked a day in his life nor provided for himself and his family on his own. He had no career before politics and doesn't even give lip service to the Constitution.

If Bush is going to make Reagan look like a liberal, he sure is off to a slow start.

116 posted on 03/26/2002 2:54:48 AM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Twodees
If you eliminate all the sentimentality and look at Reagan's record objectively, you'll find that on many issues he was less conservative than Bill Clinton.

Of course, Clinton was full of sh!t 99% of the time, but once his first two years were an utter failure he decided that his own career was more important than his liberal principles and toed the Republican Party line for the most part.

The most lasting impacts of these presidents are their Supreme Court appointments, and Reagan's weren't much better than anyone else's.

120 posted on 03/26/2002 9:11:46 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson