Fidel Castro & Hugo Chavez
admiring their good luck necklaces.
Posted on 03/24/2002 1:51:13 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
CARACAS, Venezuela -- Bombs at newspaper offices, threats against reporters, assaults on TV cameramen -- Venezuela's media say they're under siege and that the standard-bearer is none other than President Hugo Chavez.
"This is an escalating spiral of aggression, and it's being sponsored by the government," said Miguel Henrique Otero, publisher of El Nacional, one of the country's two top daily newspapers. El Nacional has been the subject of frequent vitriolic tirades by Chavez, as well as boisterous protests and a bomb that shattered a glass door at a sister newspaper, Asi Es La Noticia.
Chavez has long engaged in a verbal war of words with the press, which he lambastes as blatantly biased against him in their coverage. "The media are perverse factories of lies," he said. "What they sell is poison."
But until recent weeks, the skirmishes had been largely confined to newspaper editorial pages and Chavez's fiery speeches. Now, press advocates say, the president's incendiary verbal attacks have incited his followers to physical aggression against journalists.
Angry hordes have shoved reporters and photographers covering presidential events, rocked and banged on television-station vehicles, and spewed epithets at reporters such as "traitors to the homeland" and "sell-outs."
"Some people feel legitimized (by Chavez) in lashing out at us physically and verbally," said Globovision television reporter Jose Vicente Antonetti, who has complained to the government's Human Rights Office. "He is instigating people by saying that Globovision does not report the truth, which is totally false."
Reporters say the harassment is getting worse, with some saying that they have been followed, threatened and had their phones tapped. "One of the things they say is that my daughter is going to be the first death of this (Chavez) revolution," said Patricia Poleo, editor of the daily El Nuevo Pais.
At Chavez's radio show last Sunday, local newspapers reported that a Chavez supporter was videotaping journalists covering the event. When questioned, the videotaper ominously said the film was to identify the reporters to his colleagues.
The previous week, the official government news agency Venpres issued a story denouncing three reporters who have been relentless in uncovering government corruption scandals, claiming they are "narco-journalists" in league with drug traffickers. Chavez later termed the story "a mistake."
Officials of Chavez's government deny that they are orchestrating a campaign against reporters. "It would be very clumsy for the government to try to harm some journalists because, in some way, they want to be the center of attention," said Vice President Diosdado Cabello.
Some Chavez supporters, called Chavistas, say that journalists are merely getting as good as they have given because, they claim, the media has lost all objectivity in its political and governmental reporting.
"The media have taken a political position, which is legitimate in a democracy," said journalist William Lara, president of the National Assembly and one of Chavez's staunchest defenders. "But just as legitimate is Chavez's right to defend himself. They've called him crazy, a fascist, compared him to Hitler. No president has been subjected to this."
Faced with a largely opposition establishment press, Chavez has long sought to get his own view across to the masses. He tried to build his own media empire with a daily newspaper and weekly television show until lack of funds forced their closure two years ago.
Last year, he launched a "People's Voices" project in which he urged supporters to start community newsletters, but the project has failed to muster sway.
His most successful outlet is his four-hour-plus Sunday show Hello President, broadcast on the state-owned radio and television stations, which he commonly uses to counter the previous week's negative headlines and launch diatribes against what he perceives as unfair press coverage.
"No one can say that freedom of expression does not exist in Venezuela. There has never been wider freedom of the press here," Chavez said. "They can write what they want about me, but I have the right to reply."
Analysts say that the Venezuelan media have traditionally been tough on government, but in the past, presidents would respond with "under the table" measures such as limiting imports of newsprint.
"The press has been aggressive with all governments, but they were never attacked back," said Luis Vicente Leon, director of the Datanalisis opinion polling firm. "Chavez is attacking them frontally, and at times, he is right."
The president points to evidence such as El Nacional's March 3 publication of a fictitious front-page story in which French intellectual Ignacio Ramonet, editor of Le Monde Diplomatique, a Paris scholarly review, was highly critical of the Chavez regime.
After Ramonet disavowed any knowledge of the "interview," which the paper took from a Venezuelan Web site without verifying its authenticity, the author later admitted to inventing it as an experiment for a thesis about the unreliability of the Caribbean press.
Crowed Chavez: "The media are full of lies and you cannot believe anything they say, anything can be a lie."
Nevertheless, with journalists reporting increased harassment and growing international concern, Chavez has tried to temper his fervent followers' actions by saying that his grudge is with the "oligarch" media barons whose business interests are threatened by his leftist "peaceful revolution." Reporters, he says, are merely "workers" doing their bosses' bidding.
But Chavez still refuses to let up on his harangues against the press -- in his radio show last Sunday, for instance, the targets were the Spanish and Colombian media -- and he lauds his most radical supporters as true "revolutionaries."
The overheated atmosphere has alarmed international organizations. The Organization of American States in January ordered the government to take precautionary measures to protect journalists after Chavez's followers gathered outside the offices of El Nacional, banging pots and pans and shouting slogans for three hours. Employees were afraid to leave the premises. Officials responded by stationing police at newspaper office entrances.
After receiving numerous complaints, the Inter-American Human Rights Commission last month sent representative Santiago Canton to Venezuela for a report. Canton witnessed the tension firsthand -- raucous Chavistas disrupted his concluding press conference and refused to let him speak, forcing him to abruptly cancel the event.
Press advocates now lump Venezuela in with the region's more notorious journalist danger zones of Colombia, Cuba and Haiti. Warned the Miami-based Inter-American Press Association last week: "There is a deliberate policy by the state to restrict the exercise of freedom of expression and the right to information in Venezuela."
Press advocates warn the next step could be bloodshed.
"The fears (we) have been harboring since Chavez started lashing out at the media are materializing," said Marylene Smeets, Americas coordinator of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists. "He's created a monster."
Venezuela: Labor Strife of a Different Collar - Pdvsa--[Excerpt] CARACAS, Venezuela, March 18 - Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. may be state owned, but it is known internationally as efficient and well managed, even cutting edge. The company, one of the world's largest oil producers, has also long attracted the brightest minds in Venezuela to its singular task: producing the huge amounts of oil that motor this country.
Now, however, the behemoth, with $20 billion a year in oil sales and 40,000 employees, is in turmoil.
Its white-collar workers are locked in a bitter feud with the government of President Hugo Chávez, whose firing of the company president last month precipitated a rousing, public quarrel that has dominated the local headlines, caused a work slowdown and threatens to spill into a full- fledged strike. Such an event would be calamitous for a country where oil accounts for 80 percent of exports, most of it bound for the United States.
"This is a tragedy," said Luis Giusti, a former company president and now senior adviser for the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "It is inconceivable that in this company people would go out and protest. They would have been fired right away. But this is a crisis situation." [End Excerpt]
Chavez baits and pits people against one another to seize power. Not much different than the Jesse Jackson's, Mugabe's and Bill Clinton's of the world.
In the meantime the economy keeps growing , inflation is down production and spending are up. ,p> The problems are grave though, like the security situation and crime .The political instability caused by the media blitz on Chavez is undermining the country abroad .Chavez isn't helping with his big mouth as well
The economy is tanking, inflation is up and Chavez keeps stoking the fires of hate for the purpose of keeping the spotlight off his deplorable mess.
Here is the funny part . I feel that the only thing Chavez can do is the only thing he must not do for his own sake and it is a bitter pill that no Venezuelan leader has the courage to take .
Let him do it!! Let's see his stripes. He can follow President Vicente Fox's example in Mexico.
In the meantime Chavez is playing with the bad deck of cards he has been dealt when he went got elected and we'll see to where it goes from here.
He's shuffled and reshuffled his leadership, making it more and more restrictive, owing allegiance to him and his growing control of government. He asked to play in this game. He had a failed coup then lied his way into office and has been going full steam, taking the train toward a communist "paradise."
What has Hugo Chavez done for the poor but use them as drones by inciting them to violence for the purpose of intimidating his opposition?
Thank you for a good laugh.
You know nothing about me.
I see you haven't, I guess can't is more appropriate, told me what Hugo Chavez has done for the poor.
You really should try to ignore that bonehead. I couldn't get him to answer my questions about his hero, arafat, so I'm not surprised that he ignored your points. Don't let it frustrate you, that's the way the bolsheviks are.
Keep up the good works!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.