Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WOULD CONDI RICE AND COLIN POWELL BE "PRO-CHOICE" ON SLAVERY?
Issues & Strategy Bulletin ^ | February 28, 2001 | Howard Phillips

Posted on 03/23/2002 4:54:02 PM PST by Diago

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of February 28, 2001

WOULD CONDI RICE AND COLIN POWELL BE "PRO-CHOICE" ON SLAVERY?

"Condoleeza Rice, Bush's much-expected pick as national security adviser, has described herself as ‘reluctantly pro-choice.’

" ‘What if I described myself as reluctantly pro-slavery?’ [Douglas] Scott [President of Life Decisions International] retorted. ‘I mean, we are all reluctant to make hard choices.’ ...



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: condi; powell; proabort; rice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Diago
At this point, I don't really see what difference it would make if the GOP were to run "mildly" pro-choice candidates at the national level. The party is already operationally pro-abortion (it does nothing to even discourage abortion, while claiming it is pro-life). This whole issue is complicated by the fact that so many people evidently see abortion far too simplistically. For example, it is possible for a pro-choice politician who supports serious abortion controls to be much more effective in saving unborn babies than a "pro-life" politician who won't act on his position due to fear of political consequences, or due simply to the fact that he is not really pro-life at all. I mean, isn't the goal here to save lives and cut this dirty practice out of our cultural mainstream, or is it to simply elect politicians who claim to be pro-life to public office? I would challenge any of you to explain to me the benefit of electing "pro-lifers" who do nothing to save the unborn?

And, by the way. I would do a thousand jumping jacks in the nude while on a highway overpass as the 70's classic "Macho Man" blares from my boombox before I would vote for Colin Powell for dog catcher. So, no one should interpret this post as a defense of these RINOs. I'm simply saying they're not really much worse than what we have now.

41 posted on 03/25/2002 6:08:24 AM PST by helmsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Pro-Life Bump.
42 posted on 03/25/2002 9:40:02 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
These pictures are for Rice, Powell and Ridge and any other pro-choice individual.
43 posted on 03/25/2002 9:41:39 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Who is the worst of the bunch? www.scoogiespin.com TAKE THE READER POLL
44 posted on 03/25/2002 10:43:24 AM PST by SCOOGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Actually Satcher has resigned and will be the president or something of a black college. He'll be gone pretty soon.
45 posted on 03/25/2002 2:36:58 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Well nearly 65 million voters voted for pro-choice presidential candidates in 1992. I don't think Condi Rice being moderately pro-life would hurt the ticket's chances.
46 posted on 03/25/2002 3:10:10 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson