Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Brady, Gun Criminal?
NEWSMAX ^ | 3/22/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 03/22/2002 11:41:39 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Move over, Rosie O'Donnell: The newest "celebrity" anti-gun hypocrite is Sarah Brady.

Mrs. Brady "bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements," the New York Daily News reported Thursday.

Some people will do anything to tell a book. No doubt to increase interest in what otherwise would be a boring memoir, the gun rights opponent writes that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, "complete with scope and safety lock," at a gun shop in Lewes, Del.

"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."

According to her book, the store ran federal Brady Law and state background checks with much ado. But the book suggests she did not have her son checked, as required by Delaware law.

Delaware Justice Department spokeswoman Lori Sitler said the purchase could be illegal if Mrs. Brady did not say who she was buying the gun for and submit his "name, rank and serial number" for an inquiry.

"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler told the Daily News. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."

Gun rights advocates were surprised to hear of Mrs. Brady's antics.

"We hope that it's innocuous and there's been no laws violated," said James Jay Baker, chief lobbyist for National Rifle Association. "It's obviously interesting that Sarah would be purchasing firearms of any kind for anybody, given her championing of restrictive guns laws for everyone."

Seniors United Supporting the Second Amendment told NewsMax.com it was asking Delaware and the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate "what appears to be a criminal act" by Mrs. Brady.

"Sarah Brady is infamous for her radical anti-Second Amendment positions and her work to strip the citizens if the United States of their civil rights. She is the head of an extremist group that is working to gut the Bill of Rights," the group said in a statement.

"Sarah Brady is typical of the anti-civil rights radicals," noted John Bender, executive director of SUSSA. "She wants to ban private transfers of guns for everyone but her and her elitist friends. If a black mother in a Delaware public housing apartment did this she would already be charged with a crime. I’m wondering if Delaware has different enforcement standards for rich white women.”

The group concluded: "Sarah Brady is one of the leaders in the anti-civil rights movement’s attempt to make all private transfers of firearms illegal. Along with other extremists she pushed Congress to make this type of straw purchase illegal. Law enforcement should show her what her work has accomplished."

Mrs. Brady became a media-adored opponent of the Second Amendment after her husband, James, White House press secretary to President Ronald Reagan, was shot in a 1981 assassination attempt on Reagan.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: antisecondamendment; banglist; moosewatch; sarahbrady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last
To: Frohickey
You should tell that to the numerous drivers who have yet to claim uninsured motorist claims against uninsured woodland animals. ;)

Heck, it's so bad that even PETA is suing over a deer smashing up their car!

41 posted on 03/22/2002 12:34:43 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
SO TYPICAL

Actually, this is not typical. The news motto, "if it bleeds, it leads" is applicable here. And news organizations do not cover typical stories. When was the last time you heard of a news story about a mom picking up the groceries, or a kid doing their homework, or a motorist driving courteously to work?

42 posted on 03/22/2002 12:35:18 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The reason such stories make the news is that they are not typical. 'Man shoots son, thought he was a deer'. Has nothing to do with hunting. Has everything to do with stupidity.
43 posted on 03/22/2002 12:36:41 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I guess some people should have guns but others not.
44 posted on 03/22/2002 12:37:26 PM PST by american in america
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
or a motorist driving courteously to work

Source please…….


;<)

Eaker

45 posted on 03/22/2002 12:37:35 PM PST by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
You obviously didn't read the comments made to that criminal that shot up those pets. That's right. He's a criminal not a hunter.
46 posted on 03/22/2002 12:39:48 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
In N Georgia shooting dogs is considered an act of suicide.
47 posted on 03/22/2002 12:42:27 PM PST by Chad Bagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
What is so sporting about killing innocent animals??

"Innocent" animals?? Do you have any idea how many other animals any given bear, raccoon, etc. kills in just one year??

TO me it's just a bunch of macho men picking on a defenseless animal.

"All God's critters have knives."

Some sport.

And oversized overpadded overpaid gorillas having meetings for three hours (aka football) is any better?

I wish the deer came equiped with their own shotguns.

Apparently you're unaware of the number of hunters who get MAULED each year by deer. That's it, pick & choose your statistics....

48 posted on 03/22/2002 12:45:05 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
In N Georgia shooting dogs is considered an act of suicide.
49 posted on 03/22/2002 12:46:47 PM PST by Chad Bagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
For your sake, I do hope you are a complete and absolute vegetarian. No milk, no eggs, no animal products for your feet or makeup. None.

Otherwise, your condemning sport hunting is hypocritical and your opinion is, therefore, irrelevant.

50 posted on 03/22/2002 12:47:34 PM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Our main agenda is to have ALL guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our task of creating a Socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."

-Sarah Brady, The National Educator, January 1994, page 3

51 posted on 03/22/2002 12:48:57 PM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Bagwell
Oh poop. Did I post twice AGIAN!?
52 posted on 03/22/2002 12:49:47 PM PST by Chad Bagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: punster
Heres Sara and her friends Rosie & Diane Feinstein.

Million Mom March Morons

53 posted on 03/22/2002 12:50:15 PM PST by stlrocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
I have to admit she couldn't have picked a better thread to be hypocritical.
54 posted on 03/22/2002 12:50:23 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960;Sungirl
I wish the animals were packing around guns too! it'd be better training.

Curious Sungirl - why such hard anti-hunting beliefs?

55 posted on 03/22/2002 12:52:59 PM PST by phasma proeliator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
So if li'l Scotty has an accident with the gun his mommy bought, will Sarah sue Remington?
56 posted on 03/22/2002 12:55:07 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Will this do?

Cows with Guns

57 posted on 03/22/2002 12:55:37 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
a Remington .30-06, "complete with scope and safety lock...

So not only did she possibly break the law with a strawman purchase, but she bought a *gasp* powerful sniper rifle? Why would her son even need such a thing, anyway?

58 posted on 03/22/2002 12:56:33 PM PST by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
I think that she wants this...

Bambo


59 posted on 03/22/2002 1:07:39 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Sungirl, regarding your post #32, whether you admit it or not, it's very obvious that in your opinions about hunters, you adhere to the same biased and utilitarian mindset that is the SO TYPICAL trademark of the liberal left.

Something you need to work on.

60 posted on 03/22/2002 1:09:37 PM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson