As for "disclosure", I'm just guessing here, but the owner's name "David Westerfield" is all anyone who wants to buy the house needs to know...they can imagine anything they want from name recognition alone.
sw
The little girl has been missing for eight/nine days, and they're offering a reward for information leading to the capture and conviction of her abductor? Huh? At this stage, would it not be more normal to offer a reward for information leading to finding Danielle herself? Hoping she is still alive, or at least wanting to know whether she is alive? Once a body is found, then I can see offering this type of reward, or after it has been a very long time and the child is presumed dead.
Or maybe it is common to offer this type of reward so early in such a case? Does anyone know of other missing child cases where such has been done?
I don't know. Seems to me, at that stage, parents would just want to get her back or at least know what happened to her, and would worry about who did it and that "who" getting punished for it later.