Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws
Kentucky.com ^ | Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 | Timothy J. Burger

Posted on 03/22/2002 8:07:56 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-186 next last
To: Inspector Harry Callahan
A bump and a bookmark for commie-liberal hypocrisy!
101 posted on 03/22/2002 9:47:45 AM PST by TBarnett34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Harry, I though you were dead (insert seen from Escape From NY here). Thanks for the post and welcome back.
102 posted on 03/22/2002 9:47:57 AM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Something doesn't pass the smell test
I wonder if anybody really checked this out

This sounds like something she may have made up to try and show she is not against hunters but onlt evil handguns but in the process screwed up by not realizing if it were true she broke the law

The gunshop should be checked out to see if she was really there
103 posted on 03/22/2002 9:48:36 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
Yes, that is strange. One would think she would decline to comment. I wonder what the motive is? Hmm...
104 posted on 03/22/2002 9:49:45 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
hehehe... Thanks.
105 posted on 03/22/2002 9:52:44 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Great quote! Thanks for the heads up!
106 posted on 03/22/2002 9:53:54 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Its posted on DU. No one has responded yet. Go look quick before they pull it!

That's strange. Still no comments on the DU post. What's wrong democRATs, can't think of anything to say?

107 posted on 03/22/2002 9:54:05 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: llama7, ALL
This might be the federal violation: If she is not a resident of Delaware, and she bought a rifle in Delaware, but did not comply with Delaware laws (straw purchase under Delaware law), then that is a violation of federal law.

"A person may only buy a firearm within the person's own state, except that he or she may buy a rifle or shotgun, in person, at a licensee's premises in any state, provided the sale complies with state laws applicable in the state of sale and the state where the purchaser resides. [18 U. S. C 922( a)( 3) and (5), 922( b)( 3), 27 CFR 178.29] "

From: http://www.atf.treas.gov/firearms/faq/faq2.htm#b3

108 posted on 03/22/2002 9:55:05 AM PST by Eugene Tackleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
What's really startling is that SARAH BRADY ADMITTED TO THIS IN PRINT. Nobody would have ever known if she hadn't told the world.

This doesn't pass the smell test
Like I say I think she made this up to show that she is not against HUNTERS only EVIL handguns

Problem is she is too dumb to even know what the laws she pushed for are
109 posted on 03/22/2002 9:55:27 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
If Remington is smart, they'll spin this into a new marketing campaign, pronto! ;-)

Can't you just see wrinkly Sarah in that breakfast table scene from A Christmas Story?
Sarah: "So, Jimmy, what do you want for Christmas?"
Jimmy: "I want a 250-shot, carbine-action Red Ryder BB Gun, with the compass in the stock... or a Remington .30-06!" sotto voce (oh, noo...)
Sarah: "Mmm, No... You'll shoot your eye out."
Jimmy (voice-over): "It was the 'Mother - .30-06 Block', unsurmountable by all means known to kid-dom!"
Jimmy: (nervous laugh) "I was just kidding. I guess I'd like some Tinkertoys..."

**************************
:-)

110 posted on 03/22/2002 9:56:48 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
I still say this is BS . She made it up and is too dumb to know that she would have broken the law
111 posted on 03/22/2002 9:57:48 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Damn... looks like a hoax after all. No mention of "James, Jr." on the BradyCampaign website:

Mr. Brady was born in Centralia, Illinois, on August 29, 1940. He graduated from the University of Illinois in 1962, where he earned a B.S. degree in Communications and Political Science. Mr. Brady and his wife, the former Sarah Kemp, reside in Delaware with their son, Scott. Mr. Brady also has a daughter, Melissa.

112 posted on 03/22/2002 10:00:48 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel; uncbob
If this is a hoax on her part, add confirmed LIAR to the list of descriptions befitting her. And what else in that book of hers is LIES?
113 posted on 03/22/2002 10:03:15 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
She received her BA from the College of William and Mary in 1964. In 1973, she married James Scott Brady and they have a son, James Scott Brady, Jr. ...
114 posted on 03/22/2002 10:06:54 AM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
BWWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
115 posted on 03/22/2002 10:08:58 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I have trouble believing ANY gun dealer would hesitate to photocopy a 4473 with her signature on it and distribute it to the world IMMEDIATELY. This supposedly occurred two years ago, so we would've heard from another source if this had happened.
116 posted on 03/22/2002 10:09:45 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
James Scott Brady, Jr.

Well, I'll be sheep-dipped! :-)

Actually, I was starting to suspect this very thing. However, why would the gun dealer hold this little bombshell back? Is it against the law to make 4473 info public? Hmmm...

117 posted on 03/22/2002 10:12:11 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Sarah's son is referred to both James Jr and Scott in the article.
118 posted on 03/22/2002 10:12:39 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
From ATF F 4473 Important Notice 1

"... You are also the actual buyer if you are acquiring the firearm as a legitimate gift for a third party. ..."

I hate to rain on everyones parade but this was a legal purchase. It still stinks of hypocracy. By the way, why is she buying her son a sniper's rifle any way?

119 posted on 03/22/2002 10:13:47 AM PST by rllngrk33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Make that "referred to as both James Jr and Scott..."
120 posted on 03/22/2002 10:15:14 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson