Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
An excellent analysis and it may very well be true. However, I believe that it lets Bush off too easily. I agree with Limbaugh that it is the duty of all constitutional officers to uphold the constitution, and that includes resisting acts that are clearly unconstitutional.

Second, Bush has been very quiet on this issue. He could have been making a case that the provisions of this bill are an infringement on our freedom of speech. It’s bizarre when free speech is defined as the right of a woman to dance nude in a bar, but not for citizens to speak publicly about a candidate within 60 days of an election.

If Bush had been vocal about your scenario, I would give it more weight. Your analysis is persuasive. And for those of us who are Bush supporters, we would like to think that you have captured his motivation. However, I remain unpersuaded.

You write great essays. Do you do it for a living?

21 posted on 03/22/2002 4:19:13 AM PST by moneyrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: moneyrunner
Well, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, than ;^)

Do you do it for a living?

No, but thank you very much for the implicit compliment in your asking.

I'm just your ordinary, run-of-the-mill, highly-opinionated, ranting Freeper =^)

23 posted on 03/22/2002 4:22:18 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: moneyrunner
than=then
24 posted on 03/22/2002 4:22:42 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson