Skip to comments.
VERDICT IS COMING DOWN NOW ON SAN FRANCISCO DOG ATTACK CASE!
Fox News Channel ^
Posted on 03/21/2002 12:43:09 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
Bizarre case, and Neil Cavuto has Greta Van Cistern as commentator. If you can handle that, tune in to FNC and see what the verdict is...
TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-219 next last
To: stands2reason
Count 2--involuntary manslaughter. Both Knoller & Noel were charged. Both found guilty.
41
posted on
03/21/2002 12:50:49 PM PST
by
Catspaw
To: ambrose
Mischievous animal as a threat to others, I believe, it what they mean by mischievous.
To: Catspaw
Marjorie get 15 Years to life at 46 years old-no beastiality for her soon!
To: Righty1
Now they get to go to Big House...
Just like their "son".
To: ambrose
It is a crime to have a mischievous animal that kills is the rest of it.
45
posted on
03/21/2002 12:51:05 PM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Recovering_Democrat
(03-21) 13:49 PST LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A woman whose two huge dogs mauled a neighbor to death in a San Francisco apartment building was convicted of murder and manslaughter Thursday. Her husband was found guilty of manslaughter.
To: misterman
the verdicts are in: Guilty on every count.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Actually, the trial was held in Los Angeles...slightly less insane than SF.
To: misterman
No, they were declared guilty.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Holy cow!! Justice in a SAN FRANCISCO COURTROOM!! I'M STUNNED!! While I absolutely agree with these verdicts... keep in mind the victim was a Lesbian... had she not been, I wonder if the verdict would have been the same.
To: ambrose
Negligence?
To: Recovering_Democrat
It's so unfair. They didn't even consider the post partum depression.
;)
To: Pearls Before Swine
... and unlike OJ, they are not community heroes.That's because the dogs chomped a lesbian. I bet these freaks wouldn't have even been charged if the dogs had killed a straight white male.
53
posted on
03/21/2002 12:51:58 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: Pearls Before Swine
First the Yates verdict and now this, in an LA courtroom no less! Who besides me thinks there may be a post-9/11 backlash against those who break the law and then portray themselves as the victim? I think people are just not going to be swallowing these ridiculous defenses.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Guilty(:^>
To: HamiltonJay
An improperly handled and trained dog and irresponsible owners was the issue.
To: Bella_Bru
How can she be convicted of both Murder and Manslaughter??
I'm confused.
To: HamiltonJay
That's the position of that nutzoid defense attorney, Nedra Ruiz.
58
posted on
03/21/2002 12:52:54 PM PST
by
Catspaw
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I think this verdict might get set aside as inconsistent... you can't be guilty of both second degree murder and manslaughter on the same crime/.
59
posted on
03/21/2002 12:53:14 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: Lizavetta
They were doing their dogs????Yup, with photos to their adopted inmate son. Of course, the jury wasn't allowed to know this...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-219 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson