Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
Dear Doug,

This law, like the first campaign finance law in 1975, has a clause to "accelerate the case on the dockets." It goes only to one trial court and then directly to the Supreme Court.

The case cannot be filed until the law actually goes into effect, which is 6 November, 2002. Then, expect it to take about six months from filing of the case in trial court, to final decision in the Supreme Court. That was the time frame for the first such challenge, Buckley v. Valeo, in 1976.

I was in on the planning sessions in New York City for that first case. I will be one of the counsel of record on this case. We are going to have this law struck down as unconstitutional. Here's how strongly I feel about it: If we do not get this law struck down, I will resign as a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court, and never set foot in its building again.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The Truman Factor."

485 posted on 03/21/2002 2:53:15 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Sen. Mitch McConnell has stated he will be the lead Plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the bill. Yesterday, he said he will have an announcement concerning an "impressive" legal team within "a few days." He indicated there would be other Plaintiffs in the suit as well, including those from both the political right and the left. The suit will be styled, McConnell vs. FEC. (BTW, I think the first named Plaintiff should be a liberal group aligned with the Democrats, just so whenever the media criticizes the suit they will have to do so using the name of that group. But I understand McConnell wishing to name the suit.)

In listening to McConnell, I got the impression legal action was imminent. Once the bill is law (i.e. when it is signed), can suit be filed, or does the filing have to be after Nov. 6, 2002? In other words, if Ted Olsen could seek injunctive relief before the law takes effect, then why can't an advocacy group do the same thing?

497 posted on 03/21/2002 5:37:39 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
Good news and thanks for the info. The GOP is screwed if this affects even one election cycle. The evil unions will have a field day.

I am angry at Bush for saying he will sign this nonsense. Could it be that he is signing it knowing it will be struck down? Is that some Dicky Morris triangulation?

499 posted on 03/21/2002 6:09:13 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson