Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sneakypete
Maybe that's why he wants SCOTUS to strike it down. So it will be already ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL. By the highest court in the land.
392 posted on 03/20/2002 7:42:57 PM PST by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]


To: DJ88
Maybe that's why he wants SCOTUS to strike it down. So it will be already ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL. By the highest court in the land.

Hey, they did GWB right the first time around, eh?

393 posted on 03/20/2002 7:44:01 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

To: DJ88
Maybe that's why he wants SCOTUS to strike it down. So it will be already ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL. By the highest court in the land.

That's a stretch. Who's to say the Supremes WILL rule that way,or that they will even agree to review it?

Nope,Bubba-2 needs the guts to stand up on his hind legs and say,"I will NOT sign any bills that create un-Constitutional laws." There is no excuse for him saying he is going to sign it anyhow,despite some un-Constitutional aspects,other than he wants the law. None.

474 posted on 03/21/2002 12:02:34 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson