Posted on 03/19/2002 9:26:26 PM PST by MadIvan
This week brought news headlines screaming eighty-nine people arrested as part of the FBI’s Internet kiddie-porn ring. The FBI had targeted the worst of the worst in its nationwide operation ironically code-named “Candy Man”. Of those taken into custody, five were members of the clergy – specifically two Catholic priests and three clerics of other denominations.
However, it is these five arrests that have liberals rejoicing. The left considers those in the Christian faith as historic adversaries impeding their deviant agenda for decades. They are relishing the moment of having a laugh at the expense of the church.
Putting aside the liberal catcalls and hoots for a moment, it is necessary to remind the left they are overlooking a few details as they celebrate. Details? Like what?
Liberals like to toss out statistics claiming this behavior exists at a level of about 10% among Catholic priests. However, multi year studies about true pedophilia in the Catholic Church (defined as sexual contact between an adult and a child) indicate this type of abuse is actually very rare among priests.
According to Pedophiles and Priests (Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis) by Philip Jenkins, the best estimate is about 0.3% of the entire body of Catholic clergy. By contrast, best estimates on the level of this type of criminal predatory behavior place to around 5% of the general population.
Another problem for lefties is that simple mathematics indicates another eighty-four people were arrested. So this begs the question of where are the mighty cries of shame directed at these people? Why only just direct vitriol at five members of the clergy?
There are three reasons.
First, several of the others arrested are in vocations typically making up a large part of the left leaning “base” of support. They were teachers, guidance counselors and other types of social works. All part of a “base” that can be counted upon to vote in like minded fashion in matters of interest.
Any criminal acts committed by members of these groups are almost always hushed up or afforded protective status by the left leaning mainstream media. Pshaw, you might say, do such double standards actually exist? The answer is unless you have had your head firmly planted in an interior body cavity, they most certainly do.
One example of this collusion that can be seen daily is the double standard applied to any luckless American politician, who is arrested, indicted or sentenced guilty. If the perpetrator has the party affiliation of Democrat, then that information is conveniently omitted and the story buried in the paper.
If the perpetrator belongs to the GOP, the story makes page 1 with the words “Republican” part of the article title. Usually in large case bold font. This penchant to left leaning editorial decisions is widely known. It can be observed on an almost daily basis by anyone with eyes and the willingness to open them.
Simply put, it is not in the best interest of the media who are actively pursuing a collectivist agenda to embarrass their allies or fellow travelers in socialism. This most definitely includes sexual predators amongst them.
Second, always consider self-interests of the left’s allies. In other words, follow the money.
By their nature, churches of all faiths are extremely sensitive to serious charges involving their employees. Rightly or wrongly, this makes the church vulnerable to cases of abuse and thus they are inclined to settle out of court. The result is a virtual gold mine for lawyers while the perpetrator is shuttled out of the picture, and the victim gets “justice” in the form of compensation minus hefty fees and expenses.
To aid this trial lawyer based moneymaking effort, allies in the media gleefully report on the rare cases of clerics gone bad. The goal appears less in the interest of the public’s right to know, and more toward making sure the point is not lost on churches that next time, it could be “them”.
Third, the crux of the matter is this. It’s my contention the real issue here is homosexual predatory pedophilia. This means almost without exception, these cases involve abuse of men against boys. The left, especially cronies in the press, do not want to point out the obvious fact that homosexuals are documented as being over represented as sexual predators.
This wolf in sheep’s clothing approach is not limited to religious positions as these arrests could have easily been coaches, scout leaders and others whose work allows them close proximity to children. In all of these arrests, it seems clear these marauders followed the time tested pattern of assuming roles of authority and trust in order to gain nearness to potential victims.
Sexual predators of any political persuasion are criminals. As such, they should be dealt with swiftly and harshly. The left has neither the interest nor willingness to judge what is right and wrong.
The left lives in a world of gray in order to avoid making uncomfortable moral judgments. Their philosophy has left them unable or unwilling to criticize sexual predators as evil. As a result, as a group, they are morally bankrupt.
This position and lack of response is hardly surprising considering how duplicitous this group is. Nothing shocking at all to learn they prefer to embrace hypocrisy through criticisms of the church while happily avoiding the deviancy that oozes from their own political allies like swamp scum.
As parents or grandparents, our children are precious gifts from God. None of us intend our small loved ones become unwilling sexual toys for predators. If we remain silent, we offer tacit consent for these monsters to continue molesting our children.
Our voices, raised to high volumes, must be raised collectively to make it clear this type of behavior will not be tolerated.
We conservatives owe it to all children that we remain vigilant of those forces that, in the name of “tolerance”, are merely fronts for pedophilia. What we are facing is a real direct threat to our kids, and our society as a whole.
It is my opinion conservatives are obliged to take a vanguard role in raising our voices as loudly as possible against this evil that pervades our society.
God bless
As a mentoring principle, homosexual leaders CANNOT, therefore, be explary, and that is what harms children.
Now that being said, I support the BSA policy 100%. I should also note that two gay co-workers also support the current BSA policy, and yes one was a Boy Scout as a child.
Big bump to that! I love how in the Leftist media it’s generically labeled as “child abuse” instead of “gay” pedophilia. If those who practice perversion account for 30+% of child molestation and are only 2-3% of the population please tell me who is more likely to commit this atrocity. To quote Ann Coulter of recent: It is a fact that the vast majority of the abuser priests – more than 90 percent – are accused of molesting teen-age boys. sodomites cause sodomy.
Yep, it’s pretty much against the old “morally straight" clause in the oath, if they said they practiced incest and bestiality they’d be asked to leave too. Ya know what I mean?
Great idea! What information are you including on your poster? You might be interested in the thread Pro-Homosexual Event Opens Door for Truth -- with No Intrusions (Mom takes on the Homosexual Agenda)
"I just do not feel many parents know about this."
You are right. Many people have been mislead by the queer propaganda. Talk to parents, grandparents, friends and neighbors -- let them know what's going on. Your "Assemblyman MOUNTJOY" thread has lots of good information.
"I called the local schools and drilled them about their sex education, or diversity classes, and all denied they covered homosexul teaching..."
No surprises there! Bet your questioning made them mighty uncomfortable, though!! Keep on them -- you're bound to turn up something. Be prepared to be called a "hater" or intolerant.
You've mentioned this several times already. I didn't think that the boy scouts had such problems with den mothers in the cub scouts.
If the molestor is male and the victim is male then the molester is not acting as a heterosexual but as a SAD. Since BSA deals mostly with boys and the leaders (except den mothers) are mostly male there is no potential for heterosexual child molesters.
Please clarify
God Save America (Please)
(I'm sorry, I really am)
If they are castrated then it's not really accurate to say they're hung is it?
GSA(P)
You mean, not necessarily pedophiles, don't you?
Saturday bump to you as well, my friend!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.