Skip to comments.
But, but, but It s For The Children, Right?
Free Britannia Journal ^
| March 20, 2002
| Greg Collins
Posted on 03/19/2002 9:26:26 PM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
To: MadIvan
BTTT
61
posted on
03/20/2002 1:01:28 PM PST
by
mgc1122
To: EdReform
Thanks Ed, I am building a poster to pass out, to parents waiting to pick kids up from school and in waiting rooms in office building in my community. Can't seem to find any on the internet. I just do not feel many parents know about this. I called the local schools and drilled them about their sex education, or diversity classes, and all denied they covered homosexul teaching? Not sure I believe them though.
62
posted on
03/20/2002 4:00:55 PM PST
by
GrandMoM
To: EdReform
Thanks for the ping and I'll take your advice about making this material known.
God bless
63
posted on
03/20/2002 4:34:32 PM PST
by
EODGUY
To: scottiewottie
Additionally when a person avows homosexuality they are out on a mentoring principle, not because they may cause harm to children. In fact, many homosexuals that have "come out" and avowed their lifestyle were exemplary leaders for many years in Scouting that would never cause harm to any child. As a mentoring principle, homosexual leaders CANNOT, therefore, be explary, and that is what harms children.
To: let freedom sing
Hey, I only report the facts. Fact, some leaders in the BSA have come out of the closet, much to the surprise of all. Nowhere in any of their conduct as a Scout Leader was anyone suspect to any inappropriate behavior. Simply declaring oneself as homosexual is sufficient to remove them from Scouting.
Now that being said, I support the BSA policy 100%. I should also note that two gay co-workers also support the current BSA policy, and yes one was a Boy Scout as a child.
To: Clint N. Suhks
Ping
66
posted on
03/21/2002 8:58:59 AM PST
by
EdReform
To: EdReform
Its my contention the real issue here is homosexual predatory pedophilia
The left lives in a world of gray in order to avoid making uncomfortable moral judgments. Their philosophy has left them unable or unwilling to criticize sexual predators as evil. As a result, as a group, they are morally bankrupt. Big bump to that! I love how in the Leftist media its generically labeled as child abuse instead of gay pedophilia. If those who practice perversion account for 30+% of child molestation and are only 2-3% of the population please tell me who is more likely to commit this atrocity. To quote Ann Coulter of recent: It is a fact that the vast majority of the abuser priests more than 90 percent are accused of molesting teen-age boys. sodomites cause sodomy.
To: scottiewottie
Simply declaring oneself as homosexual is sufficient to remove them from Scouting. Yep, its pretty much against the old morally straight" clause in the oath, if they said they practiced incest and bestiality theyd be asked to leave too. Ya know what I mean?
To: GrandMoM;EODGUY;Clint N. Suhks;FormerLib;1 FELLOW FREEPER;erizona;Khepera;Brad's Gramma...
"...
I am building a poster to pass out, to parents waiting to pick kids up from school and in waiting rooms in office building in my community."
Great idea! What information are you including on your poster? You might be interested in the thread Pro-Homosexual Event Opens Door for Truth -- with No Intrusions (Mom takes on the Homosexual Agenda)
"I just do not feel many parents know about this."
You are right. Many people have been mislead by the queer propaganda. Talk to parents, grandparents, friends and neighbors -- let them know what's going on. Your "Assemblyman MOUNTJOY" thread has lots of good information.
"I called the local schools and drilled them about their sex education, or diversity classes, and all denied they covered homosexul teaching..."
No surprises there! Bet your questioning made them mighty uncomfortable, though!! Keep on them -- you're bound to turn up something. Be prepared to be called a "hater" or intolerant.
69
posted on
03/21/2002 7:42:36 PM PST
by
EdReform
To: scottiewottie
just like there are some heterosexual pedophiles in Scouting You've mentioned this several times already. I didn't think that the boy scouts had such problems with den mothers in the cub scouts.
If the molestor is male and the victim is male then the molester is not acting as a heterosexual but as a SAD. Since BSA deals mostly with boys and the leaders (except den mothers) are mostly male there is no potential for heterosexual child molesters.
Please clarify
God Save America (Please)
70
posted on
03/22/2002 9:36:52 AM PST
by
John O
To: GailA
Those who prey on children ought to be castrated. Then hung. (I'm sorry, I really am)
If they are castrated then it's not really accurate to say they're hung is it?
GSA(P)
71
posted on
03/22/2002 9:39:51 AM PST
by
John O
To: grlfrnd
Actually, I don't think it's an attraction to teens at all. It's an attraction to males and teens are the most vulnerable and pliable. In the priest case, what are they going to do, hang out in gay bars? They find someone vulnerable and "seduce" him. Obviously, many of these teens regret the contact later in life and make the accusal.
To: MadIvan
And there are people who want homosexuals to be able to adopt children. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeshhhhhhh!!!
To: Restorer
As Salman points out, the problem is homosexual statutory rape and subsequent coverup, not pedophilia. These men are despicable, but not pedophiles. You mean, not necessarily pedophiles, don't you?
To: MadIvan
Maybe it's just me, but playing games with syntax is silly. Homosexual statutory rape and abuse may have a different scientific name than pedophilia but it's just as evil.
75
posted on
03/22/2002 3:02:43 PM PST
by
mgc1122
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Well, I think the distinction between people who chase pre-pubescent children and those who pursue people past the age of puberty but under the age of consent is an important one. They both are illegal, and should be, but the first is is far more evil than the second.
76
posted on
03/22/2002 5:51:44 PM PST
by
Restorer
To: mgc1122
Bump
77
posted on
03/23/2002 12:57:50 PM PST
by
EdReform
To: EdReform
I prefer
78
posted on
03/23/2002 1:03:43 PM PST
by
Khepera
To: Khepera
Well yes, that is very good! However, I was bumping (to the top) mgc1122's insightful comment.
Saturday bump to you as well, my friend!
79
posted on
03/23/2002 1:35:25 PM PST
by
EdReform
To: EdReform
Yea I know I was doing the same thing. Oops did it again!
80
posted on
03/23/2002 5:30:13 PM PST
by
Khepera
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson